Teams

Sindecuse/Shaw

2021 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Combined

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-13vs Rusick KongWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatrick Costigan / Denise Inman vs Kathy Wennemann / James Richter6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJill Kunkel / William Schlueter vs Michelle Brower-Kitchens / William Dannevik6-3, 6-1
2021-06-13vs Rusick GodzillaLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatrick Costigan / Kevi Harwood vs Felice Rolnick / Jeff Banker3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Schlueter / Jill Kunkel vs Martina Augsburger / Sam Shouldis3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarney Bier / Jacqueline Waters vs Christine Wheeland / Carl Weiss4-6, 0-6
2021-05-23vs Rusick GodzillaWon 21
L#1 DoublesKate Kleiber / Billy Niemann vs Martina Augsburger / Sam Shouldis4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Waters / Barney Bier vs Norma Feldman / Carl Weiss6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatrick Costigan / Kevi Harwood vs Christine Wheeland / Thomas Wheeland6-1, 6-1
2021-05-16vs Rusick KongWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatrick Costigan / Denise Inman vs Michael Smith / Kathy Wennemann6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJill Kunkel / William Schlueter vs James Richter / Anne Muren6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Waters / Barney Bier vs Michelle Brower-Kitchens / John Schless6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sindecuse/Shaw31751193
2Rusick Godzilla317512104
3Rusick Kong0421021130

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
William Schlueter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Kevi Harwood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Patrick Costigan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.64
Denise Inman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Barney Bier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Dennis Myers
published 4
3.42
Billy Niemann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Jill Kunkel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kate Kleiber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Inman + Dennis Myers6164% gamesnot enough data
Jill Kunkel + William Schlueter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Schlueter
70W–93L career · 3 lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
3.94
Kevi Harwood
68W–53L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Patrick Costigan
76W–43L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Denise Inman
263W–135L career · 2 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Barney Bier
57W–63L career · 3 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Dennis Myers
30W–20L career · no lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Billy Niemann
47W–24L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
Jill Kunkel
121W–103L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
3.41
Kate Kleiber
53W–50L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.