Teams

CLin (WSRC)

2026 Combo Doubles 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Wed PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-09-02vs JMorse/BRoork (JCC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesChin Lin / Mario Sansotta vs James Londeree / Alan Black6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJeff Allcock / Clarke Hobson vs David Bentley / Kevin Keenan6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGary Usher / George VanDyne vs Alan Hamer / Anthony Hyde2-6, 1-6
2026-08-26vs JMorse/BRoork (JCC)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJeff Allcock / Clarke Hobson vs Erik Stokkebye / Alan Black6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLarry Hunt / George VanDyne vs Jeff Morse / Roger Gaines3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Lovelace / Gary Usher vs Alan Hamer / Kevin Keenan3-6, 4-6
2026-08-19vs JMorse/BRoork (JCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSteven Todd / Clarke Hobson vs Anthony Hyde / RONALD TOWNSEND6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGary Usher / Stephen Lovelace vs William Roork / Cary Campbell7-6, 7-5
2026-08-12vs JMorse/BRoork (JCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSteven Todd / Clarke Hobson vs David Bentley / Kevin Keenan6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesChin Lin / Mario Sansotta vs Timothy Gannon / Erik Stokkebye6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 65 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Wed PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CLin (WSRC)2051247
2JMorse/BRoork (JCC)02151068

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Chin Lin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.51
Steven Todd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Jeff Allcock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Allen Ramsey
published 3.5
3.15
Gary Usher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Clarke Hobson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.98
Mario Sansotta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.98
Stephen Lovelace
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Eloy ROY
published
George VanDyne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mario Sansotta + Stephen Lovelace4157% gamesnot enough data
Gary Usher + Chin Lin224 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Lovelace + Clarke Hobson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chin Lin
51W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.54
Steven Todd
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Jeff Allcock
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Allen Ramsey
16W–23L career · type S · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Gary Usher
26W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
3
Clarke Hobson
101W–50L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Mario Sansotta
34W–84L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Stephen Lovelace
40W–66L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Eloy ROY
12W–13L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
George VanDyne
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.