Teams

CUESTA TC 40MX9.0A

2023 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX9.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-08-21vs BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 40MX9.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Heimbecker / Sharon Huang vs Tri Tran / Allison Whitten1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-20vs BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 40MX9.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Heimbecker / Jean Zhang vs Anthony Vuong / Jennifer Yeager2-6, 5-7
2023-06-25vs RINCONADA PK 40MX9.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Heimbecker / Min Qian vs Daniel Brandt / Catherine Puzon4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Ying Cai
published
4.32
Carol Wang
published 4.5
4.29
Brian Heimbecker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.21
John Rongxiang Hu
published
4.16
Kate Yue Du
published
4.13
Lina Li
published
4.04
Mitch Hu
published
4.03
Guibin Tian
published
4.00
Jackie Guo
published
3.95
Jie Kong
published
3.92
Xiaoquan Yi
published
3.76
Min Qian
published
3.67
Guangyu Xu
published
3.64
Sharon Huang
published
3.19
Fred Li
published
Sandra Wong
published
Wayne Cai
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Rongxiang Hu + Carol Wang044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ying Cai
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
Carol Wang
5W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
4.32
5
Brian Heimbecker
367W–83L career · 3 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.29
John Rongxiang Hu
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.21
Kate Yue Du
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
Lina Li
11W–18L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.13
Mitch Hu
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
4.04
Guibin Tian
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
4.03
Jackie Guo
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
4.00
Jie Kong
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.95
Xiaoquan Yi
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
Min Qian
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
Guangyu Xu
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Sharon Huang
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.64
Fred Li
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
3.19
Sandra Wong
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wayne Cai
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.