Teams

KY/PAD ACREE

2026 USTA COMBO DOUBLES 40 & OVER PADUCAH · 6.5 Adult Combo Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 17 6:30 PM
Lone Oak High School
Sep 24 6:30 PM
Lone Oak High School
Oct 1 6:30 PM
Lone Oak High School
2026-08-27vs KY/PAD/SCHIFF, PriscillaLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristina Rikel / Gaby Acree vs Irene Okada / Shannon Solomon5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesANGELA PHILLIPS / Lydia May vs Kathie Farmer / Denise Grissom6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesVanessa Dallas / Corinne Rudd vs Yvette Brehm / Kellie Steele0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Adult Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/PAD/SCHIFF, Priscilla000000
2KY/PAD ACREE000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Christina Rikel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
ANGELA PHILLIPS
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Juyoung Song
published
3.01
Lydia May
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Angela DiCicco
published 3.5
2.90
Karen Petter
published
2.86
Gaby Acree
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Corinne Rudd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Wendy Elrod
published
2.48
Vanessa Dallas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Elrod + Angela DiCicco134 matchesnot enough data
Gaby Acree + Corinne Rudd314 matchesnot enough data
Gaby Acree + Christina Rikel314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Rikel
21W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
ANGELA PHILLIPS
30W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Juyoung Song
14W–13L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Lydia May
28W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3.5
Angela DiCicco
27W–64L career · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.90
Karen Petter
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Gaby Acree
27W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Corinne Rudd
10W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Wendy Elrod
7W–23L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Vanessa Dallas
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.