Teams

Volley Girlz

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.42 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-07-03Won 10
W#2 SinglesKelsey Jenkins vs Judy DeBoer6-2, 6-2
2021-06-02vs Double ShotsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarie Parker / Kelsey Jenkins vs Terri Cole / Erin Retelle6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Sonia Ivanova
published 3.5
3.17
Kristin Mumford
published 3.5
3.13
Shawna Byington
published 3.5
3.12
Shannon Stith
published 3.5
3.11
Jennifer Small
published 3.5
2.90
Jennifer Hemly
published 3
Jinny Giery
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Kate MacKay
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Katie McHargue
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kelsey Jenkins
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kimberly Stewart
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kristen Koenig
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Marie Parker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Stacie Hildebrandt
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawna Byington + Kristin Mumford8456% games+5.5% vs expected
Shawna Byington + Jennifer Small8847% games−2.3% vs expected
Marie Parker + Jennifer Small28857% gamesnot enough data
Shawna Byington + Stacie Hildebrandt20468% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Small + Jinny Giery101051% gamesnot enough data
Katie McHargue + Marie Parker5548% gamesnot enough data
Shawna Byington + Jinny Giery6252% gamesnot enough data
Katie McHargue + Jennifer Hemly4252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sonia Ivanova
102W–92L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Kristin Mumford
134W–81L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Shawna Byington
207W–193L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Shannon Stith
53W–33L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Jennifer Small
244W–196L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Jennifer Hemly
136W–98L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
Jinny Giery
52W–39L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kate MacKay
66W–22L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Katie McHargue
43W–41L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kelsey Jenkins
59W–64L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kimberly Stewart
91W–44L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristen Koenig
47W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marie Parker
92W–39L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stacie Hildebrandt
78W–48L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.