Teams

BC-MCC/AmySchmargen

2025 ADULT 40 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-16vs BC-PalosVerdesTC/TriciaRapaportWon 21
W#1 DoublesLora Penczar / Janet Zuccarini vs Karly Bonfante / Katherine Skaggs6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAmanda West vs Melissa Lumaco6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTiffany Chen / Anjili Singh vs Nina Abdo / Jessica Ke4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-02-01vs BC-LLW-SouthEnd/KathyKimLost 12
W#1 DoublesBetsey Clements / Ashley Hansen vs Kimberly Jones / Jane Song-Gee6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda West vs Maricel Pilapil-Pureza3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJill Meenaghan / Caroline Payne vs Cynthia Catibog / Denise Sands4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Taylor Rayfield
published
3.44
Anjili Singh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Dawn Reid
published 3.5
3.30
3.30
Jill Meenaghan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Leslie Lancry
published
3.27
Caroline Payne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Sandy Quigley
published
Ashley Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Betsey Clements
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Janet Zuccarini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Amanda West
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Amanda Gregory
published 3.5
3.21
Kim Solomon
published
3.18
Audra Steller
published 3.5
3.17
Lora Penczar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Rachel Alexander
published
3.08
Shelly Malone
published
3.03
Amy Schmargen
published 3
2.99
Tiffany Chen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Neeraj Rotondo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Donna Hughes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda West + Janet Zuccarini044 matchesnot enough data
Amanda West + Caroline Payne213 matchesnot enough data
Amanda West + Audra Steller123 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Gregory + Caroline Payne123 matchesnot enough data
Janet Zuccarini + Lora Penczar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Rayfield
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Anjili Singh
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.44
3.5
Dawn Reid
4W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Liesl Taylor Leikarts
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Jill Meenaghan
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Leslie Lancry
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Caroline Payne
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Sandy Quigley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Ashley Hansen
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Betsey Clements
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Janet Zuccarini
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Amanda West
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Amanda Gregory
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Kim Solomon
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Audra Steller
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Lora Penczar
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Rachel Alexander
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Shelly Malone
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
3
Amy Schmargen
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Tiffany Chen
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Neeraj Rotondo
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Donna Hughes
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.