Teams

Florida/Vickers/Mixed55&Over7.0

2023 Hillsborough Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-18vs Sun City, M. IrvingWon 20
W#2 DoublesJames Schneider / Caralyn Paul vs Brian Gray / Denarae Kelly6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Dasilva / Alecia Collins vs MILLER BASNIGHT / Shelia Basnight6-1, 6-2
2023-06-11vs Sun City, M. IrvingLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Cotey / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Michael Irving / Helene Kennedy-Peterson3-6, 2-6
2023-06-04vs Sun City, M. IrvingWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Dasilva / Margaret Filbert vs Denarae Kelly / Brian Gray6-3, 6-1
2023-05-21vs Sun City, M. IrvingWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Dasilva / Alecia Collins vs Michael Irving / Charlotte Wood6-2, 6-1
2023-05-19vs Sun City, M. IrvingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Dasilva / Margaret Filbert vs MILLER BASNIGHT / Shelia Basnight6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJames Schneider / Caralyn Paul vs Mark Nelson / Helene Kennedy-Peterson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-05-07vs Sun City, M. IrvingWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Cotey / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Michael Irving / Marie Yaghoobian5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
3.68
Eddie Collins
published 4
3.61
Caralyn Paul
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.30
Sean Friday
published
3.16
Erin Vickers
published 3.5
2.92
Elizabeth Dasilva
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Margaret Filbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Theresa Mays
published
John Cotey
published
Michael Dasilva
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Dasilva + Michael Dasilva8264% gamesnot enough data
Michael Dasilva + Margaret Filbert5071% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne-Lucie Bouchard
30W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Eddie Collins
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Caralyn Paul
289W–165L career · 5 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Sean Friday
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Erin Vickers
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Elizabeth Dasilva
115W–108L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
Margaret Filbert
40W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
Theresa Mays
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
John Cotey
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Dasilva
81W–66L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.