Teams

BHSC Fifty-fivers

2023 Charlottesville Adult Other 55 Doubles · Charlottesville Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-10vs ACAC-Bailey/ElyWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Leetzow / Merrily Main D'Arpino vs Jan Carroll / Debbie Shpigler2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-11-03vs ACAC-Bailey/ElyWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Leetzow / Merrily Main D'Arpino vs Elizabeth Black / Judith Ely6-3, 6-1
2023-10-27vs ACAC-Bailey/ElyWon 20
W#1 DoublesMerrily Main D'Arpino / Laura Leetzow vs Judith Ely / Jan Carroll6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Taggart / Jeanne Ward vs Carolyn Beckham / Patricia Foley6-3, 6-1
2023-10-20vs ACAC-Bailey/ElyWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Leetzow / Merrily Main D'Arpino vs Jan Carroll / Leslie Mcdonald6-4, 6-4
2023-10-13vs ACAC-Bailey/ElyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Anne Burns / Merrily Main D'Arpino vs Esther Bausserman / Judith Ely3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-10-06vs ACAC-Bailey/ElySplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaura Leetzow / Amy Taggart vs Judith Ely / Esther Bausserman3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMerrily Main D'Arpino / Christine Streit vs Carolyn Beckham / Deborah Smith7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-22vs ACAC-Bailey/ElyWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Taggart / Laura Leetzow vs Esther Bausserman / Carolyn Beckham7-5, 6-0
2023-09-15vs ACAC-Bailey/ElyWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Taggart / Grace Bartini vs Chris Bailey / Carolyn Beckham6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Laura Leetzow
published
3.22
Amy Taggart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Merrily Main D'Arpino
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.04
Mary Anne Burns
published
3.02
Jeanne Ward
published
2.92
Linda Jordan
published
2.83
Christine Streit
published 3
2.74
Grace Bartini
published 3
Joan Carlson
published
Michele Rowan
published
Pascale Hapgood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Merrily Main D'Arpino + Amy Taggart11755% games−2.7% vs expected
Laura Leetzow + Jeanne Ward213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Leetzow
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Amy Taggart
142W–98L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Merrily Main D'Arpino
151W–107L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22
Mary Anne Burns
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.04
Jeanne Ward
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
Linda Jordan
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Christine Streit
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Grace Bartini
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Joan Carlson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michele Rowan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pascale Hapgood
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.