Teams

EVERGREEN VALLEY COLLEGE CM8.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 8.5

17 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-16vs SUNNYVALE MTC CM8.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichal Bajdich / Matthew Nagle vs Rayne Liu / Jackie Guo6-2, 6-2
2025-10-09vs SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC CM8.5CWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichal Bajdich / Matthew Nagle vs Juan Castillo / Muralidharan Jayavelan6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-25vs LOS ALTOS GCC CM8.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichal Bajdich / Jayesh Shah vs Oliver Zhao / George Lee7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Chris Bernt
published 4.5
4.19
Dan Nandra
published 4.5
4.17
Matt Romano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Michal Bajdich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.00
Edmond Wang
published
3.96
Steve Tsai
published
3.83
Don Taylor
published
3.80
Mahesh Narayanan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.78
Vladan Popovic
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.73
Muralidharan Jayavelan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Tim Chew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Johnson Tran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Fateh Mammadov
published
3.59
Ajinkya Saraf
published 4
3.53
Kumar Kandaswamy
published
3.16
Johnny Sendejo
published
Praveen Nagarajan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michal Bajdich + Vladan Popovic303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Bernt
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
4.46
4.5
Dan Nandra
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.19
Matt Romano
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Michal Bajdich
23W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
Edmond Wang
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
4.00
Steve Tsai
14W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
Don Taylor
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Mahesh Narayanan
24W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.80
Vladan Popovic
23W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Muralidharan Jayavelan
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Tim Chew
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Johnson Tran
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Fateh Mammadov
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
4
Ajinkya Saraf
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Kumar Kandaswamy
17W–18L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
Johnny Sendejo
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Praveen Nagarajan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.