Teams

Ad.Whitten55A

2025 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-23vs Ca.Werder55ALost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Garnier / Mari Jameel vs Kate Pirrung / Stacey Giglio2-6, 1-6
2025-04-21vs Di.Williams55ALost 03
L#1 DoublesRobin Sealey / Kathy Bostrom vs Millie Rushton / India Pleasants2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMari Jameel / Sherry Elder vs Kim Gottshall / Theresa Rosario-Jansen5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKathy Garnier / Mary Kelly vs Malinda Schantz / Wanda Wilson6-3, 2-3
2025-04-14vs Mi.Fitzgerald55ALost 02
L#1 DoublesKathy Garnier / Mary Kelly vs Kim Ledlow / Cindy Orlandini2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Bostrom / Adela Whitten vs Harriet Wilson / Rebecca Jacobsen3-6, 1-6
2025-04-02vs Pa.Cochran55AWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathy Garnier / Mari Jameel vs Lisa Lathram / Karen Wakeford5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Bostrom / Robin Sealey vs Eleanor Jones / Carol Vervaert6-2, 6-1
2025-03-24vs Br.Li55ALost 02
L#1 DoublesKathy Garnier / Mari Jameel vs Brenda Li / Amy Barclay4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNoelle Schofield / Kathy Bostrom vs Joey Gibson / Adrienne Todd3-6, 3-6
2025-03-10vs Sh.Cole55ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathy Garnier / Mary Kelly vs Holly Moravec / Gwen Noble2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMari Jameel / Lori Hall vs Sharon Cole / Julee Knight7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-03vs An.Ashburn55ALost 12
W#1 DoublesNoelle Schofield / Kathy Garnier vs Lauren Boole / Karen Gupton6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobin Sealey / Kathy Bostrom vs Alison Bernhardt / Wendy Burkard4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLori Hall / Mari Jameel vs Ann Ashburn / Vicki Fritsch3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Robin Sealey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Noelle Schofield
published
3.08
Kathy Garnier
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.00
Lori Hall
published
2.86
Kathy Bostrom
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.79
Mari Jameel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.61
Sherry Elder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Garnier + Mari Jameel134 matchesnot enough data
Robin Sealey + Kathy Bostrom123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Robin Sealey
64W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Noelle Schofield
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Kathy Garnier
16W–34L career · 7 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
Lori Hall
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Kathy Bostrom
57W–84L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Mari Jameel
38W–56L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Sherry Elder
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.