Teams

SFV-Chicks with Sticks

SFV-SoCal Doubles-18 & Over · SFV - Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-12vs SFV-Slice of LifeWon 10
W#3 DoublesLina Gomez / TANIA JANICEK vs Melissa Jansson / Lauren Soll7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2021-11-21vs SFV-Love HurtsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJenny Ulch / Tricia Kim vs Tasha Gailys / Alina Chernega0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMISSY LOPEZ / Jenny Ulch vs Christine Whigham / Olga Marina6-7, 4-6
2021-10-30vs SFV-RacketeersWon 20
W#1 DoublesJacque Clendennen / Jenny Ulch vs Yana Antonova / Letty King6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTANIA JANICEK / Julie Whitmer vs Robina Markarian / Liyan Wang6-4, 7-6
2021-10-23vs SFV-Simply SmashingWon 20
W#1 DoublesTricia Kim / MISSY LOPEZ vs Mary Anna Noveck / Ameline Suson4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCecilia Greenway / TANIA JANICEK vs Katie Kennedy / Kio Novina6-4, 6-3
2021-10-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesJenny Ulch / MISSY LOPEZ vs Debra Escobar / Negar Matian6-4, 6-3
2021-09-25vs SFV-RacketeersLost 01
L#3 DoublesLina Gomez / TANIA JANICEK vs Robina Markarian / Liyan Wang6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2021-09-19vs SFV-Simply SmashingWon 20
W#2 DoublesTricia Kim / Jenny Ulch vs Kio Novina / Sarah Scott6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJenny Killgore / TANIA JANICEK vs Sandra Ackermann / Allison Mac Ewan6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Cecilia Greenway
published 4
3.55
Tricia Kim
published
3.42
Jenny Ulch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
MISSY LOPEZ
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.26
Sara Lavalle
published
3.26
TANIA JANICEK
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jacque Clendennen
published 3.5
2.94
Elizabeth Rydall
published 3
2.82
Julie Whitmer
published
2.77
Leslie Byrum
published
2.63
Penny Oxciano
published
2.60
Jenny Killgore
published
2.54
Cherie Lakin
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MISSY LOPEZ + Jenny Ulch231058% games+5.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cecilia Greenway
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
Tricia Kim
9W–8L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Jenny Ulch
70W–36L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
MISSY LOPEZ
80W–67L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
Sara Lavalle
9W–4L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
TANIA JANICEK
102W–89L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Jacque Clendennen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Rydall
105W–82L career · no lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
2.94
Julie Whitmer
13W–9L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
Leslie Byrum
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Penny Oxciano
8W–19L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
2.63
Jenny Killgore
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
21%78%<1%
2.60
3
Cherie Lakin
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.