Teams

EW-PC-Peacock

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-12vs YTC-LozanoLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven McMurray / Larry Floyd vs Robert Schefter / David Elofson1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDerek Peacock / John Buck vs Jeff Brantner / Richard Lozano2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesVincent Beasley / Emmitt Jackson vs Wally Morrison / Eric Anderson6-2, 7-5
2026-04-11vs EW-Peak-QuallsWon 21
W#1 DoublesSteven McMurray / Larry Floyd vs Tim Qualls / Kevin Tweed1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVincent Beasley / Emmitt Jackson vs Curt Andersen / Craig Fager2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDerek Peacock / Nikolla Qafoku vs Mark Jackson / Glen Satre6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-11vs YTC-LozanoWon 21
W#1 DoublesSteven McMurray / Larry Floyd vs Wally Morrison / Jeff Brantner7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesEmmitt Jackson / Vincent Beasley vs Robert Schefter / Richard Lozano0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNikolla Qafoku / Derek Peacock vs David Elofson / Anthony Anegon6-4, 6-1
2026-04-10vs EW-Peak-QuallsWon 21
W#1 DoublesNikolla Qafoku / Emmitt Jackson vs John Williams / Kevin Campbell6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSteven McMurray / Larry Floyd vs Glen Satre / Craig Fager6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWayne Kohan / Derek Peacock vs Kevin Tweed / Mark Jackson3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Larry Floyd
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.78
Vincent Beasley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Steven McMurray
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.63
Nikolla Qafoku
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Derek Peacock
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.39
Emmitt Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Wayne Kohan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
John Buck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emmitt Jackson + Vincent Beasley7852% games+0.1% vs expected
Larry Floyd + Steven McMurray3350% gamesnot enough data
Nikolla Qafoku + Derek Peacock213 matchesnot enough data
Nikolla Qafoku + Vincent Beasley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Larry Floyd
38W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Vincent Beasley
48W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Steven McMurray
23W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Nikolla Qafoku
32W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Derek Peacock
22W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Emmitt Jackson
48W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Wayne Kohan
89W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
John Buck
13W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.