Teams

Kanchi

2024 FW Tri-Level · Mens 4.0-4.5-5.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.57 / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Mens 4.0-4.5-5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.94
Erich Bein
published 5
4.35
Colton Rupkey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Jarod Sweetland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.09
Minh Lee
published
3.98
Brett Bormann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Alan Liao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
3.90
Jomar Candelaria
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Andrew Knust
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.75
Samuel Hussein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Irfan Zobayed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.63
Vinhthuy Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Caleb Gentry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Johann Cujardo
published
Joseph Sopko
published
Kyle Davidson
published
Mario Hernandez
published
Michael Torres
published
Savan Chhabra
published
Tom Weir
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Weir + Erich Bein5065% gamesnot enough data
Alan Liao + Irfan Zobayed123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Erich Bein
19W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
4.94
4.5
Colton Rupkey
115W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
4.35
Jarod Sweetland
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
7%92%1%
4.19
Minh Lee
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Brett Bormann
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.98
5
Alan Liao
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.94
Jomar Candelaria
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.90
4.5
Andrew Knust
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
3.76
Samuel Hussein
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4.5
Irfan Zobayed
24W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.68
Vinhthuy Nguyen
6W–27L career · 1 line in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Caleb Gentry
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.38
Johann Cujardo
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joseph Sopko
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kyle Davidson
9W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mario Hernandez
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Torres
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Savan Chhabra
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tom Weir
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.