CACM GOLD
2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER
9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule7 played
i
Flight standings52 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1CK NAVY | 7 | 0 | 20 | 220 |
| 2RRTC BLUE | 7 | 0 | 23 | 262 |
| 3CACI GOLD | 7 | 0 | 24 | 261 |
| 4HRCA PURPLE | 6 | 1 | 21 | 243 |
| 5KC BLACK | 6 | 1 | 28 | 252 |
| 6BCC RED | 6 | 1 | 32 | 281 |
| 7CACI YELLOW | 6 | 1 | 32 | 287 |
| 8CACM GOLD | 6 | 1 | 34 | 312 |
| 9JCC RED | 6 | 1 | 35 | 297 |
| 10GTC PURPLE | 5 | 2 | 27 | 286 |
| 11ATC RED | 5 | 2 | 28 | 274 |
| 12DCC GREEN | 5 | 2 | 28 | 257 |
| 13GPTC YELLOW | 5 | 2 | 30 | 284 |
| 14NJ VIOLET | 5 | 2 | 30 | 316 |
| 15MEA SILVER | 5 | 2 | 33 | 316 |
| 16APR YELLOW | 5 | 2 | 33 | 316 |
| 17GCC NAVY | 5 | 2 | 40 | 330 |
| 18BCC BLUE | 4 | 2 | 31 | 253 |
| 19WP SILVER | 4 | 3 | 29 | 283 |
| 20NJ PURPLE | 4 | 3 | 32 | 279 |
| 21CACM BLACK | 4 | 3 | 34 | 298 |
| 22SKY TEAL | 4 | 3 | 37 | 302 |
| 23LAC RED | 4 | 3 | 41 | 310 |
| 24PCC RED | 3 | 3 | 27 | 266 |
| 25BTA GOLD | 3 | 3 | 36 | 277 |
| 26PH BRONZE | 3 | 4 | 39 | 330 |
| 27CP GOLD | 3 | 4 | 41 | 326 |
| 28HRCA ORANGE | 3 | 4 | 43 | 328 |
| 29HW TEAL | 3 | 4 | 45 | 330 |
| 30PCRK RED | 3 | 4 | 46 | 347 |
| 31CVTA YELLOW | 3 | 4 | 46 | 334 |
| 32KNO PINK | 3 | 4 | 47 | 352 |
| 33VCC ORANGE | 3 | 4 | 49 | 344 |
| 34BRMST PINK | 2 | 4 | 38 | 295 |
| 35CACM SILVER | 2 | 5 | 43 | 343 |
| 36PCRK BLUE | 2 | 5 | 47 | 324 |
| 37MEA PINK | 2 | 5 | 47 | 362 |
| 38BTA RED | 2 | 5 | 48 | 350 |
| 39PRC RED | 2 | 5 | 48 | 337 |
| 40WP PINK | 2 | 5 | 48 | 349 |
| 41LEBTC SILVER | 2 | 5 | 52 | 346 |
| 42HFII GREEN | 2 | 5 | 53 | 383 |
| 43WP GOLD | 1 | 6 | 44 | 334 |
| 44HRCA SILVER | 1 | 6 | 45 | 336 |
| 45CPV RED | 1 | 6 | 48 | 330 |
| 46MC YELLOW | 1 | 6 | 52 | 357 |
| 47HV GREEN | 1 | 6 | 53 | 373 |
| 48RMTC PINK | 1 | 6 | 57 | 389 |
| 49CHCC BLUE | 1 | 6 | 58 | 382 |
| 50GTC GREEN | 1 | 6 | 59 | 393 |
| 51RMTC SILVER | 0 | 7 | 56 | 353 |
| 52EPR GREEN | 0 | 7 | 60 | 395 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Michelle Curtiss + Pallavi Marulasiddappa | 5–2 | 63% games | +13.0% vs expected |
| Eden Parker + Leigh Kingman | 26–13 | 55% games | +4.5% vs expected |
| Eden Parker + Michelle Curtiss | 6–2 | 55% games | +4.3% vs expected |
| Britt Nielsen + Elizabeth Anderman | 4–7 | 46% games | +0.6% vs expected |
| Leigh Kingman + Michelle Curtiss | 3–2 | 54% games | not enough data |
| Eden Parker + Maureen Kiefer | 1–3 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Leigh Kingman + Maureen Kiefer | 2–2 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Izabela Rydel + Elizabeth Anderman | 3–1 | 4 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.