Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AW4.0A-DT

2026 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2026-06-12vs OLYMPIC 18AW4.0A-DTSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaria Isabella Canlas / Ria Mendoza vs Catherine Fogelman / Maddie Thomas4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLorie Lambert / Elaine Yang vs Catherine Kelley / Shelly Lyon3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-08vs OLYMPIC 18AW4.0A-DTWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathy Fan / Hannah Kim vs Lisa Carlin / Shelly Lyon6-2, 6-3
2026-06-03vs OLYMPIC 18AW4.0A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesClaudia Vlasak / Anthea Pang vs Catherine Kelley / Maddie Thomas2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAngela Lam vs Catherine Krabbenschmidt4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSally Brien / Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke vs Shan Bai / Marie Allman6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLindsay Tonderys / Paula Mangin vs Linda Geballe / Christy Wasserman2-6, 3-6
2026-05-20vs OLYMPIC 18AW4.0A-DTSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Bennett / Anthea Pang vs Catherine Fogelman / Catherine Kelley6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAngela Lam / Tiffany Truong vs Marie Allman / Maddie Thomas5-7, 3-6
2026-05-11vs OLYMPIC 18AW4.0A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Bennett / Maria Isabella Canlas vs Catherine Fogelman / Catherine Kelley3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKathy Fan vs Rita Williams1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLorie Lambert / Elaine Yang vs Shan Bai / Shelly Lyon6-2, 6-3
2026-05-07vs OLYMPIC 18AW4.0A-DTLost 01
L#2 DoublesSally Brien / Paula Mangin vs Catherine Fogelman / Vanessa Lyons0-6, 3-6
2026-05-06vs OLYMPIC 18AW4.0A-DTWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaudia Vlasak / Kelly Bennett vs Catherine Kelley / Carla Hultman6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMaria Isabella Canlas / Anthea Pang vs Marie Allman / Rita Williams6-1, 6-1
2026-04-27vs OLYMPIC 18AW4.0A-DTLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathy Fan / Lorie Lambert vs Catherine Fogelman / Catherine Kelley2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHannah Kim / Paula Mangin vs Carla Hultman / Rita Williams1-6, 5-7
2026-04-22vs OLYMPIC 18AW4.0A-DTSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Bennett / Sally Brien vs Catherine Fogelman / Catherine Kelley3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAngela Lam / Shan Lu vs Lisa Carlin / Shelly Lyon7-6, 7-5
2026-04-17vs OLYMPIC 18AW4.0A-DTSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaria Isabella Canlas / Anthea Pang vs Catherine Fogelman / Catherine Kelley4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTiffany Truong / Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke vs Lisa Carlin / Tricia Weaver-Moss3-6, 3-6
2026-04-14vs BOYLE PK 18AW4.0A-DTLost 01
L#1 DoublesSue Weiss / Sally Brien vs Janet Lautenberger / Karla Boisvert2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-13vs OLYMPIC 18AW4.0A-DTSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Bennett / Sally Brien vs Carla Hultman / Shan Bai6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMaria Isabella Canlas / Shan Lu vs Catherine Fogelman / Catherine Kelley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings44 teams · Women 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RIO DEL ORO 18AW4.0A-DT10027311173
2WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW4.0A-DT10026412202
3PLEASANTON 18AW4.0A-DT91201024239
4BAY TREES PK 18AW4.0A-DT8225513178
5MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 18AW4.0A-DT8221920217
6SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 18AW4.0A-DT8222821228
7BROADSTONE RC 18AW4.0B-DT8221927217
8MORAGA CC 18AW4.0A-DT82171328248
9OLYMPIC 18AW4.0A-DT82181228253
10MILL VALLEY 18AW4.0A-DT7321922227
11MARIN TC 18AW4.0A-DT73201022217
12MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW4.0A-DT73161433268
13SCOTT VALLEY 18AW4.0A-DT73161435280
14BOYLE PK 18AW4.0A-DT64181226247
15JOHNSON RANCH 18AW4.0A-DT64181226219
16SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 18AW4.0B-DT64191126247
17BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW4.0A-DT64171328225
18SLEEPY HOLLOW 18AW4.0A-DT64191129247
19CUBBERLEY 18AW4.0A-DT64171332268
20RAFAEL RC 18AW4.0A-DT64161434262
21RUBY HILL GC 18AW4.0A-DT55181227221
22LOS GATOS SR 18AW4.0A-DT55191127228
23GOLD RIVER RC 18AW4.0B-DT55161432248
24SHARON HTS CC 18AW4.0A-DT55151534284
25ROUND HILL CC 18AW4.0A-DT55151535280
26MARIN CC 18AW4.0A-DT55131738306
27LOS ALTOS GCC 18AW4.0A-DT46121837276
28BAY CLUB ROSS VALLEY 18AW4.0A-DT37141636269
29BELVEDERE TC 18AW4.0A-DT37121840282
30FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 18AW4.0A-DT37121840278
31BROADSTONE RC 18AW4.0A-DT37111940291
32BAY CLUB PL 18AW4.0A-DT37111941280
33WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW4.0B-DT37111943290
34SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 18AW4.0A-DT37102043303
35DIABLO CC 18AW4.0A-DT3792145302
36BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AW4.0A-DT28121838284
37CLAREMONT R and S 18AW4.0A-DT28102045308
38GOLD RIVER RC 18AW4.0A-DT2882246283
39SILVER CREEK 18AW4.0A-DT2882247320
40BLACKHAWK CC 18AW4.0A-DT2872348314
41CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC 18AW4.0A-DT2872350325
42Corey Reich Tennis Center 18AW4.0A-DT1972347309
43TIBURON PEN C 18AW4.0A-DT1952551342
44SUTTER LAWN 18AW4.0A-DT1942653333

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Anthea Pang
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Kelly Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Claudia Vlasak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Sally Brien
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.53
Maria Isabella Canlas
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.52
Kathy Fan
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #1 Singles 11% · published
3.47
Ria Mendoza
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.45
Angela Lam
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.40
Lorie Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Shan Lu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Tiffany Truong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Paula Mangin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Fan + Lorie Lambert134 matchesnot enough data
Maria Isabella Canlas + Kelly Bennett123 matchesnot enough data
Angela Lam + Kathy Fan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthea Pang
13W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Kelly Bennett
9W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Claudia Vlasak
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Sally Brien
10W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
Maria Isabella Canlas
7W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Kathy Fan
35W–24L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
Ria Mendoza
72W–75L career · 4 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Angela Lam
17W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Lorie Lambert
12W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Shan Lu
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.36
Tiffany Truong
5W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Paula Mangin
15W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke
8W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.