Teams

Thomasson

2021 Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.07 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-06Won 10
W#2 SinglesJoshua Fretz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-01vs GladdenSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBarry Herman / Joshua Fretz vs Eric Berg / James Pope6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAdam Thomasson vs Maulik Joshi1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-05-25vs TurnleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesLuis Lozano / Adam Thomasson vs Derrick Lewis / Ronald Jenkins3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBarry Herman / Brandt Butcher vs Kushal Patel / Juan Jose Tijero2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristopher Gowen / Joshua Fretz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-20vs AppelWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoshua Fretz / Geoffrey Saunders vs Frank von Hendricks / Brian Kovalski6-4, 6-4
2021-05-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesJoshua Fretz / Geoffrey Saunders vs Ross Foca / David Kim7-5, 7-5
2021-04-29vs GladdenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKevin Holston - (DQ)* / Barry Herman vs Greg Leihy / Volkan Taskin7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristopher Gowen / Adam Thomasson vs Stephen Waagbo / Rondall Payton6-3, 6-1
2021-04-06vs CrawleySplit 11
L#2 DoublesJason Campion / Adam Thomasson vs DONALD CRAWLEY / Mark Guo2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesJoshua Fretz vs Joseph Benderson5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-03-30vs NicholsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrandt Butcher / Barry Herman vs Stephen Wolff / Greg Koch4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Luis Lozano
published
4.26
Andrew Kennedy
published 4.5
3.89
Joshua Fretz
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.86
Adam Thomasson
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.74
Andre Taggart
published 4
3.74
Barry Herman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.58
Thomas Chappell
published
3.54
Brian Kuhn
published 4
3.50
Michael Witting
published
3.15
Jorge Paucar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barry Herman + Joshua Fretz2351% gamesnot enough data
Adam Thomasson + Joshua Fretz134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luis Lozano
68W–31L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
4.40
4.5
Andrew Kennedy
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
4.26
4
Joshua Fretz
161W–117L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Adam Thomasson
151W–127L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Christopher Gowen
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Andre Taggart
9W–6L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Barry Herman
75W–99L career · 10 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Thomas Chappell
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Brian Kuhn
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.54
Michael Witting
4W–17L career · no lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.50
Jorge Paucar
7W–16L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.