Teams

Sets in the City

2026 Winter League-Saturday · 2.5W Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-14vs Level UpLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Midyett / Carissa Monroy vs Kassidy Oasay / Keerstin Smith1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElise Buchman / Amanda Robinson vs Mikelle Pouwer / Rachael Gilmore3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRayna Lofgren / Sabrina Vienneau vs Linda Zhang / Neena Yoon3-6, 0-6
2026-03-07vs Cottonwood Club-Johnson/HarrisonLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Hughes / Dart Schmalz vs Kristin Rocke / Lisa Harrison5-7, 1-3
L#2 DoublesElise Buchman / Rayna Lofgren vs Crystal Connors / Lindsay Sparks6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDemarest Kenrick / Kristin Midyett vs Sandra Sweetland / Kathryn Tunacik6-0, 6-4
2026-02-28vs LP-En FuegoWon 20
W#1 DoublesElise Buchman / Demarest Kenrick vs Shelly Kaihatu / Pingjiao Huang6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristin Midyett / Sabrina Vienneau vs Courtney Mamani / Mindy Wilson6-3, 6-4
2026-02-21vs LP-For the LoveLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristin Midyett / Stephanie Goldstein vs Stacy Harbertson / Shelby Hales1-6, 2-5
L#2 DoublesElise Buchman / Demarest Kenrick vs Heather Wissler / Kimberly Chytraus4-6, 5-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarissa Monroy / Amanda Robinson vs Ashley Theodore / Angela Fletcher6-4, 5-2
2026-02-14vs SLTHC-Smith ShotsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDemarest Kenrick / Sabrina Vienneau vs Leah Ekblad / Julia Richmond5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRayna Lofgren / Kristin Midyett vs Jessie Richards / Martha Howe6-1, 6-3
2026-02-07vs Sports Mall-Team FunLost 12
L#1 DoublesSabrina Vienneau / Carissa Monroy vs Hailey Jensen / Karen Weyman2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDemarest Kenrick / Amanda Robinson vs Madison Milligan / Eunae Park1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRayna Lofgren / Dart Schmalz vs Kiera Henderson / Christina Jones6-3, 6-4
2026-01-31vs SLTHC-Love AllLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Robinson / Dart Schmalz vs Brooke Louis / Sarah Turnbow3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Hughes / Carissa Monroy vs Victoria Rosdahl / Brittney Werth6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDemarest Kenrick / Elise Buchman vs Emily Lammers / Crystal Beffa0-6, 2-6
2026-01-24vs Level UpLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Hughes / Demarest Kenrick vs Kassidy Oasay / Keerstin Smith0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKate Morham / Dart Schmalz vs Stephanie Coleman / Rachael Gilmore1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.13 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.33
Demarest Kenrick
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.30
Carissa Monroy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.25
Rayna Lofgren
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.21
Amanda Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.16
Dart Schmalz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.10
Elise Buchman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.08
Kristin Midyett
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.06
Laura Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.00
Sabrina Vienneau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
1.82
Kate Morham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Stephanie Goldstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Midyett + Carissa Monroy1736% games−1.2% vs expected
Amanda Robinson + Elise Buchman3544% games−7.9% vs expected
Sabrina Vienneau + Rayna Lofgren2836% games−9.7% vs expected
Demarest Kenrick + Amanda Robinson134 matchesnot enough data
Demarest Kenrick + Elise Buchman224 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Midyett + Laura Hughes134 matchesnot enough data
Rayna Lofgren + Laura Hughes224 matchesnot enough data
Dart Schmalz + Laura Hughes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Demarest Kenrick
6W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Carissa Monroy
19W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Rayna Lofgren
9W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Amanda Robinson
24W–46L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Dart Schmalz
9W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
2.5
Elise Buchman
6W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Kristin Midyett
41W–130L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Laura Hughes
11W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Sabrina Vienneau
5W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Kate Morham
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Stephanie Goldstein
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.