Teams

Pinborough/Sato

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0M

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 9 6:00 PM
Liberty Park Tennis Center
Sep 14 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Tom PinboroughKoji Sato
2026-08-31vs PowerHouseLost 03
L#1 DoublesM Vinson Miner / Thad Smith vs Scott Sudbury / Joel Littleford3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTom Pinborough / Brent Anderson vs TROY GRANGER / Russ Paskins6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKirk Hall / John Anderson vs Chuck Russell / Tom King2-6, 2-6
2026-08-24vs Osborn/BurnsideLost 12
L#1 DoublesM Vinson Miner / Thad Smith vs Tony Mokhtarian / Ron Burnside3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRussell Shino / Koji Sato vs Bradley Colton / Thomas Illingworth7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Anderson / Ron Beeson vs Kelvin Nilsen / Garth Neilsen7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-19vs PowerHouseLost 12
W#1 DoublesM Vinson Miner / Thad Smith vs David Ludlow / Russ Paskins7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRussell Shino / Clay Snaza vs Scott Sudbury / Joel Littleford3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTom Pinborough / Brent Anderson vs Chuck Russell / David Noyce2-6, 2-6
2026-08-12vs PowerHouseWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Anderson / Kirk Hall vs David Ludlow / Spencer Young4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-03Split 11
L#2 DoublesRon Beeson / Kirk Hall vs Ron Burnside / Tony Mokhtarian6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Wilkin / John Anderson vs David Osborn / David Rozsa6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PowerHouse1133753
2Osborn/Burnside1133760
3Pinborough/Sato1133856

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
M Vinson Miner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brent Anderson
published 3.5
Steven Allred
published 3.5
3.16
Koji Sato
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Clay Snaza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Tom Pinborough
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Russell Shino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Kirk Hall
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Thad Smith
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.01
Ron Beeson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Matthew Wilkin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ron Beeson + Kirk Hall6456% games+8.5% vs expected
M Vinson Miner + Kirk Hall7065% games+0.3% vs expected
M Vinson Miner + Thad Smith224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

M Vinson Miner
91W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Brent Anderson
4W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Steven Allred
59W–39L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Koji Sato
48W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Clay Snaza
23W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Tom Pinborough
32W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Russell Shino
44W–72L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Kirk Hall
34W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.11
Thad Smith
114W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
3.5
Ron Beeson
49W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
Matthew Wilkin
16W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.