Teams

Cape Canaveral - Reid

2022 Brevard Trilevel · 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-22vs Brevard/Desoto - WolszczakLost 02
L#1 DoublesGwynn Joseph / Susan Kontos vs Kristin Harang / Julia Watters5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaegan Hulscher / Tara DelGado vs Missi DeMorat / Julie Wolszczak4-6, 4-6
2022-10-08vs Suntree - GregoryWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarcia Lusk / Christi Reid vs Denise Camera-Gaug / Robin Davis6-4, 7-6
2022-10-01vs Rockledge - RosenquistLost 01
L#1 DoublesGwynn Joseph / Tara DelGado vs Gina Palombi / Margaret Cornell2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-24vs Brevard/Desoto - WolszczakSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTerry Taylor / Susan Kontos vs Colleen McNatt / Erica Cossairt3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTara DelGado / Maegan Hulscher vs Joni Smith / Anna Butler4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-09-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTerry Taylor / Susan Kontos vs Robin Davis / Margaret Staples6-7, 2-6
2022-08-27vs Desoto - McLachlanWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarcia Lusk / Christi Reid vs Sylvie Briscoe / Erika Nigh6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTara DelGado / Jillian Shulder vs Astrid Johnson / Sylvia Segura6-4, 6-1
2022-08-27vs Rockledge - RosenquistLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristi Reid / Susan Kontos vs Desirae McLaughlin / Melissa Johnson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-08-20vs Kiwi -DevereauxLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristi Reid / Marcia Lusk vs Chaninda Narakorn / Angela Copeland3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Susan Kontos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Maegan Hulscher
published 4
3.99
Marcia Lusk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Katie Husty
published 4
3.84
Tara DelGado
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Terry Taylor
published
3.36
Jane Benton
published
3.21
Cynthia Simmons
published 3.5
Charmin Husty
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcia Lusk + Susan Kontos134 matchesnot enough data
Marcia Lusk + Tara DelGado314 matchesnot enough data
Susan Kontos + Tara DelGado213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Kontos
42W–57L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.20
4
Maegan Hulscher
139W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
4.08
4.5
Marcia Lusk
74W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
Katie Husty
90W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Tara DelGado
120W–77L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
Terry Taylor
25W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
Jane Benton
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Cynthia Simmons
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Charmin Husty
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.