Teams

HCC - W. Li

2025 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesEmiliya Cogdill / Meng Zhang vs Nicole Evans / Anne Wooley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-08vs Valencia Lakes Vixens - L. TaylorWon 20
W#1 DoublesEmiliya Cogdill / Fan Wang vs Sharon Lucas / Yvonne Wigg7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHong Liu / Wenhong Li vs Laurie Panizzo / Linda Taylor6-3, 6-0
2025-03-01vs Hills/Burke/55&Over7.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesWenhong Li / Fan Wang vs Silvia Srour / Joan Whitten2-6, 3-6
2025-02-22vs Hunters Green - E. VickersWon 10
W#2 DoublesFan Wang / Emiliya Cogdill vs Danna Sturman / Elizabeth Dasilva6-1, 6-1
2025-01-25vs Valencia Lakes Vixens - L. TaylorWon 20
W#1 DoublesFan Wang / Emiliya Cogdill vs Kellie Smith / Linda Taylor6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesWenhong Li / Xue Chan vs Sharon Lucas / Yvonne Wigg6-2, 6-2
2025-01-18vs Hills/Burke/55&Over7.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesConnie Wang / Wenhong Li vs Beth Hart / Jody McNamee6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Dong Li
published
3.50
Fan Wang
published
3.41
Min Long
published
3.39
Wenhong Li
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Emiliya Cogdill
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Margarita Colon
published
3.24
Lin Zhang
published
3.08
Xue Chan
published
2.99
Wei Xue
published
2.79
Hong Liu
published
Meng Zhang
published
Victoria Peralta
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emiliya Cogdill + Min Long7065% games+9.1% vs expected
Wenhong Li + Margarita Colon5160% games+8.8% vs expected
Wenhong Li + Xue Chan5061% games+3.6% vs expected
Fan Wang + Min Long404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dong Li
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Fan Wang
32W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Min Long
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Wenhong Li
116W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
Emiliya Cogdill
97W–79L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Margarita Colon
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Lin Zhang
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Xue Chan
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Wei Xue
22W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Hong Liu
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Meng Zhang
15W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Victoria Peralta
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.