Teams

MacCall

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 55 & over · Women 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-30vs Sample 55-6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Kocor / Tara MacCall vs Terry Thompkins / Vanessa Plotner4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCorky Sturtevant / Maggie Anderson vs Stephanie Markley / Jules Sample4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHeather Michael / Donna O'Meara vs Connie West / Sydney Werner6-7, 4-6
2026-08-26vs Kear/LepariWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Williamson / Donna O'Meara vs Ewa Marziano / Brenda DiMeglio6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCaroline McMahon / Pamela Klawitter vs Nancy Garland / Kathleen Kear6-3, 2-3
L#3 DoublesHeather Michael / Jacqueline Travagliante vs Lisa Stenger / Sandra Babyak2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fenton/Richard D2051332
2Pelton/Daly DAY2042546
3Cesareo (DAY)1030013
4Graeser 2026 55+ 6.5 Combo1021327
5Weeks (Day) Fall 2026 Combo1133754
6MacCall000000
7Stephanski/Hollett-Mott000000
8Sample 55-6.5000000
9Ferner Combo0112430
10Lemmons (Day)0112530
11Doss 55+ Combo0112531
12Kear/Lepari0103636
13Kontoulas DAY02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Arnone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Tara MacCall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Caroline McMahon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Donna O'Meara
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Camille Restione
published 3
2.82
Heather Michael
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Kelly Kocor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Corky Sturtevant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Sue Leff
published
Pamela Klawitter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Consoletti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna O'Meara + Camille Restione213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anna Arnone
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tara MacCall
20W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Caroline McMahon
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Donna O'Meara
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Camille Restione
25W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Heather Michael
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Kelly Kocor
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Corky Sturtevant
0W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Sue Leff
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
Pamela Klawitter
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Susan Consoletti
1W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.