Teams

Chestnut Ridge

2026 18&Over Women Day Fall · 3.5 Day

22 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-05vs Grand Slam: No Man´s Land - NYLost 12
L#1 DoublesVanessa Colaco / Kim Goldner vs Natalia Garcia / Payson Murray4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Rose / Christine Marucci vs Limor Pompa / Katie Oxman1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Rothenberg / Courtney Scavo vs Courtney Rault / Rocio Diez6-0, 6-4
2025-11-24vs Greenwich Racquet ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Agdern / Jessica Bremer vs Liese Brown / Dana Charette4-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Lowitz / Robin Schultz vs Tracy Guarnera / Gabriella Feinstein4-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDenise Wenacur / Vanessa Colaco vs Anne Rockel / Karina Campos4-6, 2-6
2025-11-20vs WTC: Ace Ace BabyWon 21
W#1 DoublesValerie Jacobs / Jialan Wang vs Leah Rapoport / Sarah Fraser6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Rose / Christine Marucci vs Jennifer Soliman / Clare Ansel0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJessica Bremer / Courtney Scavo vs Kyle Healy / Danielle Weiss2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-11-03vs Armonk Tennis Club: Ace Ace BabyWon 21
L#1 DoublesKim Goldner / Jialan Wang vs Sophia Kim / Dina Weinstein3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDiana Mann / Katie Sweeney vs Nicole Berman / Lauren Anchin7-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRobin Schultz / Julie Lowitz vs Maria Pedersen / Stephanie Lewis6-1, 6-1
2025-10-29vs OGTA: Serves You Right SouthernWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulia Kelly / Katie Sweeney vs Amy Moore / Elana Gershon6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRachel Massa / Diana Mann vs Laura Newman / Christiana Perrein4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Rothenberg / Vanessa Colaco vs Maha Mostofi / Siri Kloud6-2, 6-2
2025-10-23vs Saw Mill Club: We've Got BallsWon 21
W#1 DoublesValerie Jacobs / Lisa Agdern vs KENDLE ARCIDIACONO / Amy Lerner7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRobin Schultz / Natalie Gorlin vs Eve Kecskes / Ruthie Rosenberg0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Massa / Diana Mann vs Robyn Cartularo / Susan Wilson7-6, 6-1
2025-10-07vs Clubfit Briarcliff: FirecrackeresWon 21
W#1 DoublesAbby Woodworth / Lisa Agdern vs Catherine Hammond / Elyse Poole6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJialan Wang / Karen Rothenberg vs Susan Flanagan / Lisa Moore6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDenise Wenacur / Christine Marucci vs Maggie Engles / Betsy Ellison4-6, 1-6
2025-09-29vs GCC: Net Rushers (NY)Won 21
L#1 DoublesAbby Woodworth / Julie Lowitz vs Suzanne Roth / Ashley Smith4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKim Goldner / Jennifer Rose vs Patricia Hopper / Sonal Rinello6-4, 6-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Massa / Natalie Gorlin vs Catherine Castelli / Caroline Paradiso6-1, 7-6
2025-09-22vs Innis Arden - Tennis Lovin'Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Agdern / Karen Rothenberg vs Kendra Lisowski / Morgan Gilbert6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulia Kelly / Katie Sweeney vs Alexis Finkel / Stefanie Vitti6-7, 3-3
L#3 DoublesValerie Jacobs / Abby Woodworth vs Erica Naidorf / Melissa Roth4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Rachel Massa
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Valerie Jacobs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Diana Mann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Jessica Bremer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.35
Lisa Agdern
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Abby Woodworth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Katie Sweeney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Julia Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Kim Goldner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Denise Wenacur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Rose
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Julie Lowitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Ali Miller
published 3.5
3.21
Karen Rothenberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Vanessa Colaco
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Jialan Wang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Robin Schultz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Natalie Gorlin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Courtney Scavo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Christine Marucci
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Jennifer Rackoff
published
Olivia Reighley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Kelly + Diana Mann4167% games+15.4% vs expected
Jennifer Rose + Robin Schultz5358% games+10.2% vs expected
Vanessa Colaco + Katie Sweeney7162% games+9.1% vs expected
Julia Kelly + Katie Sweeney5257% games+8.7% vs expected
Diana Mann + Katie Sweeney4160% games+8.3% vs expected
Denise Wenacur + Natalie Gorlin5155% games+8.1% vs expected
Abby Woodworth + Julie Lowitz5358% games+5.8% vs expected
Jialan Wang + Natalie Gorlin3350% games+4.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rachel Massa
118W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
Valerie Jacobs
63W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Diana Mann
84W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jessica Bremer
146W–77L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Lisa Agdern
12W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Abby Woodworth
67W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Katie Sweeney
82W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Julia Kelly
53W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Kim Goldner
105W–59L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Denise Wenacur
47W–53L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Jennifer Rose
160W–109L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Julie Lowitz
55W–51L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Ali Miller
33W–17L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Karen Rothenberg
89W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Vanessa Colaco
32W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Jialan Wang
129W–84L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.12
Robin Schultz
141W–102L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Natalie Gorlin
61W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Courtney Scavo
26W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Christine Marucci
89W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.92
Jennifer Rackoff
31W–21L career · no lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.90
Olivia Reighley
19W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.