Teams

Belmont Bond 5.0

2026 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 5.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.80 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-07vs Westwood GodseyWon 30
W#1 DoublesRomain Ambert / Juan Gamboa vs Seth Feibelman / Joseph Brown6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJustin Cerny vs Kevin Long6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobert Wagner / Alfredo Rodriguez vs Konstantin Dombrovskiy / Erik Wright6-0, 6-1
2026-05-31vs Westwood GodseySplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiego Alejandro Parada / Juan Gamboa vs Patrick Gee / David Reed3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAlfredo Rodriguez / Romain Ambert vs Randy Loden / Seth Feibelman4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-05-17vs Westwood GodseyWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiego Marti Vertiz / Diego Alejandro Parada vs David Reed / Jack Allen3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDillon Sykes vs Colin Mudrick6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRomain Ambert / Aaron Paul vs Patrick Gee / Kevin Long7-6, 6-4
2026-05-10vs Westwood GodseyWon 21
L#1 DoublesJustin Cerny / Diego Marti Vertiz vs David Reed / Jack Allen1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDillon Sykes vs Glenn Diersen6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeremy New / Drew Campbell vs Seth Feibelman / Konstantin Dombrovskiy6-4, 7-6
2026-04-28vs Westwood GodseyWon 21
L#1 DoublesMoses Hutchison / Jeremy New vs David Reed / Joseph Brown5-7, 7-6
W#1 SinglesRishi Charan Shankar vs Colin Mudrick6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Wagner / Alfredo Rodriguez vs Jack Allen / Seth Feibelman6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-04-26vs Westwood GodseyWon 30
W#1 DoublesDrew Campbell / Rishi Charan Shankar vs Raymond Kanyo / Konstantin Dombrovskiy6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDillon Sykes vs Colin Mudrick6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAaron Paul / Diego Marti Vertiz vs Erik Wright / Jack Allen6-4, 6-2
2026-04-12vs Westwood GodseyWon 21
W#1 DoublesDrew Campbell / Jeremy New vs Kevin Long / Joseph Brown6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRishi Charan Shankar vs Glenn Diersen6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlfredo Rodriguez / Robert Wagner vs Patrick Gee / Erik Wright4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-04-04vs Westwood GodseyWon 21
W#1 DoublesRishi Charan Shankar / Justin Cerny vs Randy Loden / Joseph Brown6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMoses Hutchison vs David Reed5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDrew Campbell / Diego Alejandro Parada vs Patrick Gee / Seth Feibelman7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Belmont Bond 5.08018616185
2Westwood Godsey0861839269

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.98
Romain Ambert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.96
Dillon Sykes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.92
Rishi Charan Shankar
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.74
Diego Alejandro Parada
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.71
Justin Cerny
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.66
Juan Gamboa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.59
Robert Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.57
Diego Marti Vertiz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.49
Jeremy New
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.47
Doug Bond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.42
Drew Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Aaron Paul
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Moses Hutchison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Romain Ambert
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.98
5
Dillon Sykes
80W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.96
Rishi Charan Shankar
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.92
5
Diego Alejandro Parada
134W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.74
Justin Cerny
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.71
Juan Gamboa
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.66
Robert Wagner
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.59
5
Diego Marti Vertiz
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.57
Jeremy New
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.49
4.5
Doug Bond
59W–22L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
4.47
Drew Campbell
4W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.42
4.5
Aaron Paul
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Moses Hutchison
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.