Teams

1*SGraff-Eno

2024 Eno River Tri-Level-18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women Wknd

12 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2024-07-25vs 2*ECurry-CHTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristie Elliott / Spenser Radtke vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKim Goll / Abigail Weaver vs Lisa Baxter / Maribeth Hamilton7-5, 6-3
2024-07-22vs 6*MLong-EnoWon 20
W#2 DoublesKristie Elliott / Samantha Collins vs Laurie Keilholz / Jamie Moy6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLoralie Bible / Susan Graff vs Mary T Long / Stacy Brehm6-3, 7-6
2024-07-21vs 4*LBonzani-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Nagy / Kristie Elliott vs Kristin Isaacs / Charmayne Rozenek6-3, 6-3
2024-07-14vs 3*ELinnander-SVCWon 10
W#1 DoublesLoralie Bible / Kristin Cooley vs Kimberly Donica / Gretchen LoFrese6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2024-06-29vs 3*ELinnander-SVCLost 03
L#1 DoublesHillary Mulder / Jenna Schreiber vs Tiffany Langino / Erika Linnander4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMaria Sanchez / Cheryl Smyth vs Kimberly Donica / Allison Stewart-Smull1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Graff / Kinsey Wennerstrom vs Laura Caldwell / Ann Flodin4-6, 3-6
2024-06-24vs 5*KGreen-EnoLost 12
W#1 DoublesJenna Schreiber / Spenser Radtke vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKristie Elliott / Cheryl Smyth vs Shelly Guo / Miho Ogura4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAbigail Weaver / Kinsey Wennerstrom vs Che-Jung Chang / Jui-Hua Hsieh1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-06-18vs 4*KNorris-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnnika Kruse / Kristie Elliott vs Kolleen Fitzgerald / Kathryn Kabat6-3, 6-3
2024-06-16vs 9*NDolan-HRWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristie Elliott / Samantha Collins vs Amanda Pierce / Drew Scruggs6-4, 6-0
2024-06-14vs 8*LAlkhawam-DFCWon 20
W#1 DoublesSamantha Collins / Kristie Elliott vs Diane Allen / Jeanne Murray6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLoralie Bible / Kristin Cooley vs Kensy Ryan / Betsy Euler6-0, 6-2
2024-06-09vs 6*MLong-CCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesYaas Bigdeli / Kristie Elliott vs Tammy Chin / Katie Elder2-6, 1-6
2024-06-08vs 6*MLong-EnoWon 20
W#2 DoublesCheryl Smyth / Christine Hunt vs Bonni Baird / Sara Lawrence6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLoralie Bible / Kristin Cooley vs Jamie Moy / Stacy Brehm6-2, 6-4
2024-06-02vs 7*LKulp-BPWon 10
W#1 DoublesLoralie Bible / Kristin Cooley vs Jennifer Magee / Karen Schmitz7-5, 6-2
2024-06-01vs 2*ECurry-CHTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesHillary Mulder / Jenna Schreiber vs Elizabeth Keating / Brook Holton Sheahan6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristie Elliott / Annika Kruse vs Andy Blackburn / Gail Calloway7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMaria Sanchez / Kinsey Wennerstrom vs Sarah Ederle / Dina Golden4-6, 6-7
2024-05-26vs 3*ELinnander-SVCWon 10
W#2 DoublesLoralie Bible / Jessica Nagy vs Laura Caldwell / Stacy Brehm1-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Spenser Radtke
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Jenna Schreiber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Kristin Cooley
published
3.67
Hillary Mulder
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.55
Loralie Bible
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kristie Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.02
Kinsey Wennerstrom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Abigail Weaver
published 3
2.91
Cheryl Smyth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Susan Graff
published
2.85
Kim Goll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Samantha Collins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kinsey Wennerstrom + Susan Graff6257% games+10.5% vs expected
Kristin Cooley + Loralie Bible25364% games+6.5% vs expected
Hillary Mulder + Spenser Radtke111648% games+2.9% vs expected
Cheryl Smyth + Kim Goll4350% gamesnot enough data
Susan Graff + Abigail Weaver1447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Spenser Radtke
105W–80L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Jenna Schreiber
65W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.72
Kristin Cooley
56W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.68
4
Hillary Mulder
46W–63L career · 8 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Loralie Bible
186W–65L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Kristie Elliott
24W–39L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Kinsey Wennerstrom
127W–103L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Abigail Weaver
18W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.00
3
Cheryl Smyth
212W–231L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
Susan Graff
43W–41L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Kim Goll
132W–134L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%87%12%
2.85
Samantha Collins
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.