Teams

Have Fun

2024 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-06-18vs Ace.HolesWon 10
W#3 DoublesJacob Skinner / Steve Hatten vs Jason Waddoups / Luke Felt6-2, 6-1
2024-06-13vs TennisciousLost 01
L#1 SinglesNoah Rusk vs Carter Anderson2-6, 0-6
2024-05-21vs Ace.HolesLost 12
L#1 SinglesJacob Skinner vs Josh Wardle4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKyle Polito / Noah Rusk vs Creston Dupree / Carson Bird6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteve Hatten / Bill Fritz vs Thomas Angstman / Grayson Kash3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Ryan Cook
published 4
3.38
David Holt
published 3.5
3.28
Mark Thomann
published
3.28
ChaiHuat Chong
published 3.5
3.24
Michael Polito
published
3.17
Kevin Hoffman
published
3.12
Kyle Polito
published
3.04
Patrick Moore
published
Bill Fritz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jacob Skinner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Noah Rusk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Steve Hatten
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Polito + Mark Thomann9361% games+2.8% vs expected
Kevin Hoffman + Ryan Cook13556% games+1.2% vs expected
Michael Polito + Kyle Polito181950% games−1.7% vs expected
David Holt + Michael Polito2351% gamesnot enough data
David Holt + Mark Thomann1441% gamesnot enough data
David Holt + Kyle Polito303 matchesnot enough data
Bill Fritz + Steve Hatten123 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Hoffman + Mark Thomann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ryan Cook
143W–65L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
3.5
David Holt
88W–139L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.38
Mark Thomann
98W–86L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
ChaiHuat Chong
38W–98L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Michael Polito
61W–50L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
Kevin Hoffman
168W–126L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Kyle Polito
34W–40L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Patrick Moore
56W–82L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Bill Fritz
20W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jacob Skinner
11W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Noah Rusk
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Hatten
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.