Teams

Maier

2022 Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-04-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Maier / Byron Dickerson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-19vs NicholsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesByron Dickerson / Sona Hussian vs Jack Lavinder / Pamela Cahouet3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-03-12vs NicholsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesByron Dickerson / Megan Gladwell vs Kushal Patel / Joi Remoll2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-02-26vs GladdenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesByron Dickerson / Sona Hussian vs Daniel Mandl / Janet Miller6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJ Harris / Brandie Sparr vs Greg Leihy / Joanne Connelly3-6, 5-7
2022-02-12vs GladdenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiana Heinze / Byron Dickerson vs Nannette Littlejohn / Tim Mowry6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrandie Sparr / Giap Nguyen vs Janet Miller / Greg Leihy6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2022-02-06vs AppelLost 01
L#3 DoublesByron Dickerson / Diana Heinze vs Tom Lusby / Marla Lusby3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-04vs NicholsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesByron Dickerson / Sona Hussian vs Andrew Kennedy / Lisa Marthens6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJesse Carrington / Brandie Sparr vs Jack Lavinder / Joi Remoll6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-01-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesByron Dickerson / Diana Heinze vs Gary Gladden / Lisa Thompson7-6, 6-1
2022-01-23vs NicholsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesByron Dickerson / Sona Hussian vs Jack Lavinder / Pamela Cahouet6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJesse Carrington / Brandie Sparr vs Scott A Green / Jennifer Nyman6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
J Harris
published 4
3.80
Byron Dickerson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.75
Brandie Sparr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Diana Heinze
published 4
3.66
Susan Maier
published
3.63
Giap Nguyen
published 4
3.50
Megan Gladwell
published
2.93
Sabra Szczyglowski
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
J Harris
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Byron Dickerson
46W–31L career · type S · 9 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Brandie Sparr
104W–102L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Diana Heinze
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Susan Maier
14W–3L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Giap Nguyen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Megan Gladwell
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
Sabra Szczyglowski
32W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.