Teams

A6 Belmont Sherdel

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-03vs A3 ACAC StephensWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary-Lynn Ferrante / Laura Ransone vs Dawn MacHonis / Jennifer Cubitt4-6, 2-2
W#1 DoublesSusanne Nazur / Laura Ransone vs Robbin Coleman / Joy Nyman6-4, 6-0
2023-04-29vs A2 Dominion Sweeney/ WagnerLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Ransone / Tina Carter vs Heidi Collier / Melissa MacAleese2-6, 1-6
2023-04-22vs A9 Three Chopt Pearson BreakersLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Ransone / Linda Benson vs Katherine Mortimer / Marineth Kight3-6, 3-6
2023-04-01vs A5 KRA Smash Girls Green/TurnerLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Ransone / Karin Sheets vs Laurie Barnes / Wendy Daniel1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Laura Ransone
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.32
Rashelle Hayes
published
3.27
Susanne Nazur
published
2.83
Karin Sheets
published
2.79
Heather Scott
published
2.78
Linda Benson
published
2.72
Stacy Sherdel
published
2.69
Tina Carter
published
2.65
Shivani Jain
published
Sherry Elliott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Sherdel + Heather Scott134 matchesnot enough data
Linda Benson + Heather Scott213 matchesnot enough data
Heather Scott + Karin Sheets123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Laura Ransone
82W–76L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
3.58
Rashelle Hayes
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Susanne Nazur
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Karin Sheets
13W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Heather Scott
24W–37L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.79
Linda Benson
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
2.78
Stacy Sherdel
16W–43L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
Tina Carter
15W–17L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
Shivani Jain
4W–18L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
2.65
Sherry Elliott
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.