Teams

Dane

2025 Lubbock Adult League 18 & Over · 4.0 Ladies

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-22vs CejaWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Pace / Ashley Harris vs Kellye Sparkman / Claudia Bradley7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChelsea Schulz / Paige Dane vs Renee Cook / Lauren Holloway3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAli Hamilton / Shannon Isom vs Paulette Sturdivant / Laura Smith6-4, 6-1
2025-05-01vs CejaWon 32
W#1 DoublesMarlowe Malouf Lawson / Shannon Isom vs Aimee Blake / Camille Cruz6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesGabrielle Weber vs Eva Ceja1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Dane / Beth Sublett vs Claudia Bradley / Laura Smith4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLeigh Looney vs Kindahl Jackson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKim Cone / Sharla Letbetter vs Lauren Holloway / Charla Showalter6-0, 6-0
2025-04-10vs CejaLost 23
W#1 DoublesMarlowe Malouf Lawson / Allison Pace vs Charla Showalter / Kindahl Jackson6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLeigh Looney vs Kellye Sparkman5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Dane / Beth Sublett vs Paulette Sturdivant / Renee Cook2-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesGabrielle Weber vs Eva Ceja2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesShannon Isom / Sarah Wakefield vs Larkin Johnson / Camille Cruz6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Sharla Letbetter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Kristen Strefling
published
3.87
Marlowe Malouf Lawson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Kim Cone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Shannon Isom
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.69
Chelsea Schulz
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.62
Ali Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.58
Allison Pace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Beth Sublett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Gabrielle Weber
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.41
Sarah Wakefield
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.40
Paige Dane
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Leigh Looney
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Sublett + Paige Dane5750% games+1.7% vs expected
Ali Hamilton + Shannon Isom4259% gamesnot enough data
Allison Pace + Ali Hamilton314 matchesnot enough data
Kim Cone + Sharla Letbetter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharla Letbetter
19W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.97
Kristen Strefling
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
Marlowe Malouf Lawson
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
Kim Cone
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
Shannon Isom
23W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Chelsea Schulz
16W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Ali Hamilton
29W–12L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Allison Pace
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
3.5
Beth Sublett
23W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
Gabrielle Weber
10W–9L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Sarah Wakefield
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
Paige Dane
19W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Leigh Looney
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.