Teams

LA - LATC

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over – LA · LA - Women 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesDonna Econn / Mylene Moreno vs Hannah An / Karen Haltrecht4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesIrene Anderson / Dana Reinisch vs Casey Weitzman / Carrel Hoffman6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonna Econn / Susan Kneafsey vs Karen Bruckner / Casey Weitzman1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDana Reinisch / Mylene Moreno vs Carrel Hoffman / Yolanda Zackler7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesDana Reinisch / Joni Martino vs Karen Haltrecht / Antonieta Monaldi4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMylene Moreno / Donna Econn vs Jacki Shepherd / Karen Bruckner6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDana Reinisch / Mylene Moreno vs Karen Haltrecht / Jill Koenig4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoni Martino / Susan Kneafsey vs Karen Bruckner / Jacki Shepherd5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jill Bauman
published
3.77
Michele Weiss
published
3.72
Lara Fermanis
published
3.62
Dana Reinisch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Mylene Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Joni Martino
published
3.47
Susan Kneafsey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Chase Winton
published 4
3.41
Donna Econn
published
3.04
Vicki Carrington
published
Irene Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Reinisch + Mylene Moreno1444% gamesnot enough data
Donna Econn + Joni Martino044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Bauman
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
Michele Weiss
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Lara Fermanis
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Dana Reinisch
103W–77L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
4
Mylene Moreno
103W–61L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
Joni Martino
9W–18L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Susan Kneafsey
30W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.47
4
Chase Winton
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
Donna Econn
7W–23L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.41
Vicki Carrington
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Irene Anderson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.