Teams

ALACHUA/Neeland

2022 Alachua Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-18vs Jonesville - McGriffWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenny Neelands / Melissa Justis vs Ann Redfern / Kristin Graham6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTerry Rodriguez / Lauren Moehle vs Danielle McGriff / Tina Waters6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-07-15vs Westside Court CrushersWon 20
W#1 DoublesEslie Nero / Melissa Justis vs Leandra Combass / Martha Jost6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJenny Neelands / Terry Rodriguez vs Barbara Muller / Shelby Barton6-1, 6-0
2022-07-10vs Westside Court CrushersWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenny Neelands / Eslie Nero vs Amanda Sholty / Lisa Booth6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDella Tuten / Melissa Justis vs Jasmine Angelini Knoll / Leandra Combass6-0, 6-3
2022-06-26vs Jonesville - McGriffWon 20
W#1 DoublesEslie Nero / Melissa Justis vs Ann Redfern / Kristin Graham6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJenny Neelands / Della Tuten vs Maureen Ratliff / Cassie Johnson6-4, 6-2
2022-06-25vs Jonesville - McGriffWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Justis / Eslie Nero vs Danielle McGriff / Maureen Ratliff6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJenny Neelands / Della Tuten vs Cassie Johnson / Ann Redfern6-2, 6-4
2022-06-19Won 20
W#1 DoublesJenny Neelands / Sophie Marcoux vs Martha Jost / Jasmine Angelini Knoll6-0, 4-3
W#1 SinglesLauren Moehle vs Barbara Muller6-0, 6-4
2022-05-29vs Westside Court CrushersWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Justis / Sophie Marcoux vs Martha Jost / Shelby Barton6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJenny Neelands vs Amanda Sholty6-1, 6-0
2022-05-22vs Jonesville - McGriffWon 10
W#1 SinglesLauren Moehle vs Cassie Johnson6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Jenny Neelands
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.42
Melissa Justis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Lauren Moehle
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.01
Sophie Marcoux
published
2.84
Terry Rodriguez
published
2.82
Eslie Nero
published 3
Anne Engemann
published 3
2.66
Della Tuten
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Justis + Jenny Neelands21763% games+26.9% vs expected
Lauren Moehle + Melissa Justis224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jenny Neelands
243W–94L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
3.5
Melissa Justis
93W–43L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Lauren Moehle
80W–56L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Sophie Marcoux
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.01
Terry Rodriguez
20W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Eslie Nero
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Anne Engemann
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Della Tuten
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.