Teams

LTC-M RED

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesBenoit Cauwe / John Crook vs Tim Coleman / Charles Smith6-4, 3-5
2023-05-24vs GLDN BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesBenoit Cauwe / John Guillod vs Troy Lowrie / Brant Lahnert4-6, 5-7
2023-05-03vs NJ REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesBenoit Cauwe / John Guillod vs Lawrence McGaughy / Dan Mestaes6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2023-04-26vs BP REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesBenoit Cauwe / John Crook vs Dave Klene / Tony Delacruz6-0, 6-3
2023-04-23vs RHCC BLUELost 01
L#2 SinglesBenoit Cauwe vs Matthew Charles3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Max Coates
published
3.98
John Crook
published
3.90
John Guillod
published
3.75
Benoit Cauwe
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.73
Mike Salisbury
published
3.72
Brandon Solari
published 4
3.72
Jacob Mueller
published
3.54
David Strom
published 4
3.51
Leighton Johnson
published
3.44
Joe Martinez
published
Jordan Zlotoff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Crook + Max Coates2345% games+1.7% vs expected
Joe Martinez + Jacob Mueller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Max Coates
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
4.00
John Crook
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.98
John Guillod
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
3.90
4
Benoit Cauwe
48W–50L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
Mike Salisbury
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Brandon Solari
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Jacob Mueller
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
David Strom
6W–23L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Leighton Johnson
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
Joe Martinez
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.44
Jordan Zlotoff
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.