Teams

Yadkin/Willlow Creek/18+3.5

2025 Yadkin Valley Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women-Wednesday (day)

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-07vs Yadkin/Thompson/OT/18+3.5Lost 23
L#1 DoublesNicole Smith / Courtney Penley vs Sara Cannon / Brandi Jacques2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Howell vs Gaines Douglas6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNiddy Corrias / Rachel Mohorn vs Carla Hoots / Sarah Dalena6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesAllison Aldridge vs Walker Jones6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarilyn Nowell / Kathryn Harrell vs Jennifer Bryan / Elizabeth Hollan3-6, 4-6
2025-04-30vs Yadkin/Haggard/18+3.5 DayWon 40
W#1 DoublesCourtney Penley / Morgan Qubein vs Amy Backus / Amber Trbonja6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSarah Howell vs Summer Xing6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelly Penley / Nicole Smith vs Lauren Timcheck / McKenzie Edwards6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarilyn Nowell / Kathryn Harrell vs Sherry Tibbs / Leigh Janjua6-0, 6-1
2025-04-23vs Yadkin/FCC/18+3.5 DayLost 01
L#3 DoublesNiddy Corrias / Brenda Varner vs Julie Clark / Kristen Mason6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2025-04-16vs Yadkin/Thompson/OT/18+3.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesKelly Penley / Laura Coleman vs Sara Cannon / Mary Reid4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNiddy Corrias / Rachel Mohorn vs Elizabeth Hollan / Whitley Sheffield6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMorgan Qubein vs Kathryn Campbell7-5, 6-3
2025-04-09vs Yadkin/Haggard/18+3.5 DayWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Varner / Niddy Corrias vs Jenny Orr / Nikki Francis3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-02vs Yadkin/FCC/18+3.5 DayLost 23
W#1 DoublesCourtney Penley / Kelly Penley vs Kelly Rike / Margaret Bohon7-6, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMorgan Qubein vs Katherine Collins6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDebbie Shane / Laura Coleman vs Lily Fulks / Sarah Team6-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesAllison Aldridge vs Callie Kaszycki5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRachel Mohorn / Jill Phelps vs Mary Lancaster / Kristen Mason3-6, 1-6
2025-03-26vs Yadkin/Thompson/OT/18+3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMorgan Qubein / Debbie Shane vs Katie Thompson / Sara Cannon2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathryn Harrell / Marilyn Nowell vs Carla Hoots / Kathryn Campbell6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJill Phelps / Allison Aldridge vs Whitley Sheffield / Walker Jones4-6, 1-6
2025-03-19vs Yadkin/Haggard/18+3.5 DaySplit 22
L#1 DoublesDebbie Shane / Courtney Penley vs Katelyn Chapman / Lauren Timcheck4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesSarah Howell vs Amber Trbonja6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMarilyn Nowell / Kathryn Harrell vs Leigh Janjua / McKenzie Edwards6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Coleman / Jill Phelps vs Melissa Faulkner / Sherry Tibbs3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-12vs Yadkin/FCC/18+3.5 DayWon 40
W#1 DoublesLaura Coleman / Debbie Shane vs Julie Clark / Kristen Mason6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSarah Howell vs Callie Kaszycki6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNiddy Corrias / Nicole Smith vs Mary Lancaster / Victoria Boysen6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAllison Aldridge vs Sarah Team6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women-Wednesday (day) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Sarah Howell
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.61
Morgan Qubein
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.27
Courtney Penley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.27
Niddy Corrias
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kelly Penley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Brenda Varner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Allison Aldridge
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Cackie Marsh
published 3
Debbie Shane
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
Jill Phelps
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathryn Harrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Marilyn Nowell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rachel Mohorn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marilyn Nowell + Kathryn Harrell4171% games+10.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Howell
32W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Morgan Qubein
22W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
4
Courtney Penley
4W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.27
Niddy Corrias
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Kelly Penley
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Brenda Varner
137W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Allison Aldridge
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Cackie Marsh
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Debbie Shane
2W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Phelps
2W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.68
Kathryn Harrell
4W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marilyn Nowell
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Mohorn
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.