Teams

BROADSTONE RC 40AM4.0A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#2 DoublesMark Andorf / David Sebba vs Amit Srivastava / Kamesh Vedula6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-02-24vs SUTTER LAWN 40AM4.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Sebba / Mark Andorf vs Paul Gee / David Johnson6-2, 6-3
2024-02-03vs RIO DEL ORO 40AM4.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Andorf / David Sebba vs MacArio Ramiscal / Edward Werley6-4, 6-0
2024-01-11vs ED MITCHELL PK 40AM4.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesFrederick Anderson / David Sebba vs Chandra Mahadevan / Venu Bojja6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
John Sedar
published
4.03
David Sebba
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.03
Oliver Wreford
published
3.81
Mark Andorf
published
3.79
William Bunce
published
3.76
Michael Dozier
published
Darin Carlsen
published 4
Greg Violette
published 4
3.72
Kris Jornlin
published
3.71
Thomas Kim
published
3.43
Eric Roscoe
published 4
3.34
John Andorf
published
3.21
Chris Jensen
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Dozier + Kris Jornlin314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Dozier + William Bunce213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Sedar
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
4.03
4.5
David Sebba
85W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.03
Oliver Wreford
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
4.03
Mark Andorf
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
William Bunce
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
Michael Dozier
34W–28L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Darin Carlsen
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Frederick Anderson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Greg Violette
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kris Jornlin
18W–20L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
Thomas Kim
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Eric Roscoe
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.43
John Andorf
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Chris Jensen
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.