Teams

MAC-Haynes

2024 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

15 players · average NTRP 2.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-02-18vs WOCC-SampsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Powers / Greg Chadwick vs Wes Kaufman / Jennifer Burris6-1, 6-3
2024-02-10vs Salisbury-StembridgeWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Powers / Aditya Chavan vs Dan Stembridge / Carla Shaffer6-4, 6-3
2024-01-27vs Burkwood-SweeneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesGreg Chadwick / Kristen Powers vs Kimberley Dages / Scott Schoenwiesner7-5, 6-2
2024-01-07vs WOCC-CrowellLost 01
L#1 DoublesGreg Chadwick / Kristen Powers vs Emily Kennedy / Jim Kennedy6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
RAVI KALKUNTE
published
2.93
Kristen Powers
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.86
Paul Haynes
published
2.84
Aditya Chavan
published 3
2.82
Todd Manning
published
2.77
Chitra Chavan
published 3
2.74
Gary Kessler
published
2.72
Stacy Sherdel
published
2.57
Mark Chronis
published
2.55
Lawrence Golixer
published
2.33
Katherine Benedict
published
2.26
Nancy Broaddus
published
2.17
Gail Gold
published
2.13
Deepa Kalkunte
published 2.5
Greg Chadwick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

RAVI KALKUNTE + Deepa Kalkunte3346% gamesnot enough data
Lawrence Golixer + Chitra Chavan2350% gamesnot enough data
Stacy Sherdel + Aditya Chavan224 matchesnot enough data
Aditya Chavan + Chitra Chavan314 matchesnot enough data
Paul Haynes + Nancy Broaddus033 matchesnot enough data
Mark Chronis + Stacy Sherdel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

RAVI KALKUNTE
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.19
Kristen Powers
188W–193L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Paul Haynes
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Aditya Chavan
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Todd Manning
16W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Chitra Chavan
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Gary Kessler
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
Stacy Sherdel
16W–43L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Mark Chronis
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.57
Lawrence Golixer
14W–16L career · no lines in 2024
0%37%63%
2.55
Katherine Benedict
3W–16L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
2.33
Nancy Broaddus
6W–22L career · no lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
2.26
Gail Gold
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Deepa Kalkunte
5W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Greg Chadwick
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.