Teams

Lake Padgett - S. Roy

2022 Hillsborough Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 and Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.95 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#3 DoublesHolly Charles / Darin Garner vs Heidi Milan / Stephen McCormick7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-20vs Hills - HCC 8.0 Mixed/HelmeSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAlbert Alhadeff / Rhonda Mendoza vs Thinh Duong / Nelci Rodrigues2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRandolph Gibson / Caralyn Paul vs Richard Helme / Elizabeth Burdick3-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesRhonda Mendoza / Albert Alhadeff vs Kristin McCormick / Peter Marsocci6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCaralyn Paul / Randolph Gibson vs Casey Gates / Roger Bensinger6-3, 6-3
2022-01-23vs River Hills - B. DeBrockeWon 20
W#2 DoublesRhonda Mendoza / Albert Alhadeff vs Gretchen Wood / Michael Quinn6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKim Fernald / Darin Garner vs Elisa Buffington / Barry Cohen6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
3.99
Kim Fernald
published
3.91
Eugen Schwarz
published 4
3.87
Paul Zack
published
3.87
Rhonda Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Albert Alhadeff
published 4
Holly Charles
published 4
3.69
Sylvain Gauthier
published
3.68
Julie Center
published 4
3.61
Caralyn Paul
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.52
Darin Garner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Rebecca Gibson
published
3.43
Beth Hart
published 3.5
3.38
Marie Bialousz
published
3.31
Sylvie Roy
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darin Garner + Rhonda Mendoza213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
4.06
Kim Fernald
11W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Eugen Schwarz
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
Paul Zack
31W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Rhonda Mendoza
162W–81L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Albert Alhadeff
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Holly Charles
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sylvain Gauthier
23W–18L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Julie Center
39W–43L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Caralyn Paul
289W–165L career · 6 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Darin Garner
104W–81L career · 4 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
Rebecca Gibson
25W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Beth Hart
31W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.43
Marie Bialousz
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Sylvie Roy
161W–139L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.