Teams

SD 6.0 Mtn View/ Canales

2026 Adult 55 & Over Spring · Summer- SD

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-05vs SD 6.0 Balboa TC/ KardonLost 02
L#1 DoublesRebecca Canales / Golda Dunlap vs Tina Morton / Kim Timberlake2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKeiko Small / Victoria Ferguson vs Helen Newlin / Mary Warshaw1-6, 2-6
2026-07-31vs SD 6.0 SDTRC/ SwirhunLost 01
L#3 DoublesRebecca Canales / Catherine Block vs Melinda Meader / Anna Marie Barnard0-6, 0-6
2026-07-17vs SD 6.0 SDTRC/ SwirhunLost 01
L#3 DoublesCatherine Block / Teresa Vega vs Quan Choi / Stephanie Erickson3-6, 1-6
2026-07-16vs SD LLW WD 6.0 Peninsula TC/ StacyLost 02
L#2 DoublesRebecca Canales / Suzanne St Clair vs Janet Bergland / Alicia Burnes0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesVictoria Ferguson / Teresa Vega vs Laura Stacy / Ginger Boulger4-6, 1-6
2026-07-10vs SD LLW WD 6.0 Peninsula TC/ StacyLost 02
L#2 DoublesCatherine Block / Teresa Vega vs Wendy Collins / Jennifer Hagstrom1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Canales / Victoria Ferguson vs Karen Axmann / Lisa Givens2-6, 1-6
2026-07-07vs SD 6.0 SDTRC/ SwirhunSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTeresa Vega / Catherine Block vs Nancy Swirhun / Natalie Anderson0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRebecca Canales / Suzanne St Clair vs Polly Kolotas / Anna Marie Barnard2-6, 1-6
2026-07-03vs SD 6.0 Balboa TC/ KardonLost 01
L#2 DoublesRebecca Canales / Golda Dunlap vs Maria Annen / Jane Rider3-6, 3-6
2026-06-19vs SD 6.0 Balboa TC/ KardonWon 10
W#3 DoublesGolda Dunlap / Rebecca Canales vs Robin Kardon / Kim Sweeney6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-12vs SD LLW WD 6.0 Peninsula TC/ StacyLost 02
L#2 DoublesCatherine Block / Teresa Vega vs Ruth Hoffman / Ladan Monshi2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKeiko Small / Victoria Ferguson vs Elayne Berman / Ginger Boulger1-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Summer- SD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD LLW WD 6.0 Peninsula TC/ Stacy8122516161
2SD 6.0 Balboa TC/ Kardon54151226224
3SD 6.0 SDTRC/ Swirhun45121531218
4SD 6.0 Mtn View/ Canales1852247309

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Karen Shibuya
published 3
2.75
Victoria Ferguson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Keiko Small
published 3
2.54
Elisa Fakhimi
published 3
2.52
Suzanne St Clair
published 3
2.47
Golda Dunlap
published 3
2.44
Karen McJunkin
published
2.42
Catherine Block
published 3
2.21
Teresa Vega
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.20
Rebecca Canales
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Golda Dunlap + Keiko Small4547% games+7.0% vs expected
Catherine Block + Teresa Vega41134% games−3.2% vs expected
Rebecca Canales + Golda Dunlap2440% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne St Clair + Rebecca Canales044 matchesnot enough data
Keiko Small + Victoria Ferguson044 matchesnot enough data
Karen Shibuya + Keiko Small213 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Block + Golda Dunlap123 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Vega + Rebecca Canales213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Karen Shibuya
63W–52L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.88
Victoria Ferguson
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.75
3
Keiko Small
16W–27L career · no lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Elisa Fakhimi
5W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Suzanne St Clair
13W–21L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Golda Dunlap
53W–49L career · type A · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
Karen McJunkin
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
3
Catherine Block
41W–55L career · no lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.42
Teresa Vega
18W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Rebecca Canales
7W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.