Teams

4.0 TDC Orioles-Sherman

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-01vs Westwood Heavy Hitters - LeftwichLost 23
L#1 DoublesPrabir Purohit / Nick Bawa vs Thomas Leftwich / Peyton Bowman2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEvan Limoges vs Sean DiBlasi7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTimothy Sherman / Kevin McGee vs Christopher Caputo / Shailesh Khatri6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesJustin Hart vs Blake Wehman7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJiyya Rao Kondeti / John Sweeney vs Walker Neill / George Brickley5-7, 2-6
2025-04-27vs CCV AveryWon 32
L#1 DoublesScott Sorkin / Nick Bawa vs Rolf Welch / Rich McDaniel5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEvan Limoges vs Russell Moore6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTimothy Sherman / Joe Basil vs Alexander Schaaf / Edward Rider6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJeremy Theisen vs John Cronly4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBoyd Collier / John Sweeney vs Emmett Avery / Danny MacNelly7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Evan Limoges
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.92
Jeremy Theisen
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.81
Scott Sorkin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Jiyya Rao Kondeti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Timothy Sherman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Joe Basil
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Boyd Collier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
John Sweeney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Justin Hart
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Kevin McGee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nick Bawa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Prabir Purohit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Sorkin + Joe Basil224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Evan Limoges
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Jeremy Theisen
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.92
Scott Sorkin
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Jiyya Rao Kondeti
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Timothy Sherman
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.60
Joe Basil
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Boyd Collier
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
John Sweeney
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Justin Hart
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kevin McGee
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nick Bawa
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Prabir Purohit
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.