Teams

BCC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-30vs LTA-Q ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesNatalia Harms / Annah Worland vs Emily Pieper / Lori Preston5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDana Heather / Megan MacIntosh vs Lisa Maggio / Julie Benson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeth Petersen / Katherine Honea vs Sara Campbell / Dena Stark6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-05-23vs BRMST PINKWon 31
W#1 DoublesJackie Kramer / Annah Worland vs Susan Moore / Sarah Post6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNora Astley vs Alexandra Bueno6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Forward / Beth Petersen vs Carol Anderson / Keelan Blazer6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDana Heather / Marsha Vigil vs Kari Diamond / Sandy Sutton4-6, 3-6
2024-05-16vs TTA REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesDana Heather / Megan MacIntosh vs Sarah Vincent / Rossi Javernick1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Forward / Beth Petersen vs Catherine Jankowski / Diana Goodreau6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesNora Astley vs Kaylee Henley4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNatalia Harms / Katherine Honea vs Jordan Smith / Isabella Egan3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-05-09vs CVTA YELLOWSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRachel Forward / Marsha Vigil vs Melissa Balcerak / Susan Hoy6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAnnah Worland vs Bethany Sartell1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMegan MacIntosh / Dana Heather vs Alisa Mallinger / Amanda Kapolnek6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesNora Astley vs Jenna Prey4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-08vs BRMST PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesNora Astley / Annah Worland vs Sandy Sutton / Sarah Post6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShelly Edwards / Rachel Forward vs Lynn Knickerbocker / Kari Diamond6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDana Heather / Megan MacIntosh vs Jennifer Carlson / Carrie Korth7-5, 7-6
2024-05-02vs BTA-IBM PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesNora Astley / Annah Worland vs Veronica Johnston / Christy Valentine6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDana Heather / Natalia Harms vs Ruth Henderson / Sally Lowell6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRachel Forward / Beth Petersen vs JORDAN KAAR / Kristi Gray6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-25vs LTA-Q ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesShelly Edwards / Annah Worland vs Lori Preston / Julie Benson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Forward / Dana Heather vs Julie Fletcher / Claire Schlosser4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMARGARET GOTTLIEB / Natalia Harms vs Dena Stark / Lisa Maggio3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Natalia Harms
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Nora Astley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Annah Worland
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.27
Dana Heather
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.23
Beth Petersen
published 3.5
3.23
Katherine Honea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Megan MacIntosh
published
3.14
Rachel Forward
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.06
MARGARET GOTTLIEB
published
2.87
Shelly Edwards
published
Jackie Kramer
published
Marsha Vigil
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalia Harms + Megan MacIntosh5073% games+20.7% vs expected
Beth Petersen + Rachel Forward7260% games+10.1% vs expected
Annah Worland + Natalia Harms3254% games−1.1% vs expected
Dana Heather + Natalia Harms7259% games−1.2% vs expected
Annah Worland + Rachel Forward8360% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Honea + Annah Worland2547% gamesnot enough data
Annah Worland + Nora Astley7068% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Honea + Rachel Forward123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Natalia Harms
49W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Nora Astley
67W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Annah Worland
55W–26L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Dana Heather
95W–33L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Beth Petersen
15W–12L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Katherine Honea
16W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Megan MacIntosh
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Rachel Forward
50W–37L career · 6 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
MARGARET GOTTLIEB
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
Shelly Edwards
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
2.87
Jackie Kramer
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marsha Vigil
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.