Teams

GEPTA-4.0-Adult/M(Jones)(EPTC#1)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule15 played
2024-05-23vs GEPTA-4.0-Adult/M(Alvidrez)(TW)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Cervantes / Rodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez vs Abraham Celaya / Jesus Manuel Alvidrez6-4, 6-1
2024-05-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesEugenio Prado / Rodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez vs Mauricio Cisneros / Luis Carbajal6-1, 2-1
2024-05-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesJesus Martinez / Rodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez vs Richard Castillo / Michael Bezemek4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Cervantes / Rodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez vs Keanu Lopez / Evaristo Campos Torres6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-11-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlejandro Cervantes / Rodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez vs Steven Molinar / Jose Lopez6-0, 6-3
2023-11-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesRodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez / Jesus Martinez vs Mauricio Rodriguez / Jose Uribe6-0, 6-4
2023-11-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Cervantes / Rodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez vs Christopher Baryla / Adrian Ordonez6-7, 3-6
2023-11-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesRodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez / Jesus Martinez vs Juan Acevedo / Tyler Smith6-2, 6-2
2023-10-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlejandro Cervantes / Rodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez vs Greg Garcia / Albert Lanza4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-10-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesRodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez / Alejandro Cervantes vs Aram Trejo / Alan Valdez6-3, 6-2
2023-10-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesRodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez / Alejandro Cervantes vs Joseph Isaac / Alejandro Orozco5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-10-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVictor Tapia / Rodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez vs Daniel Jones / Miguel Pantoja3-6, 6-7
2023-09-18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJesus Martinez / Rodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez vs Luis Dominguez / Steven Haynes3-6, 5-7
2023-09-12vs GEPTA-4.0-Adult/M(Lopez)(EPTC#3)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Cervantes / Rodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez vs Sergio Carmona / Steven Molinar6-3, 6-3
2023-09-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesVictor Tapia / Rodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez vs Chuck Duarte / Adrian Ordonez6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA-4.0-Adult/M(Mirazo)(EPTC#5)102431742459
2GEPTA-4.0-Adult/M(Gandarilla)(EPTC#2)102421846448
3GEPTA-4.0-Adult/M(Jones)(EPTC#1)84402048446
4GEPTA-4.0-Adult/M(KIM)(FB)84372352490
5GEPTA-4.0-Adult/M(Dominguez)(EPTC#4)57263474564
6GEPTA-4.0-Adult/M(Orozco)(TW)48233781576
7GEPTA-4.0-Adult/M(Smith)(CCC)210164492641
8GEPTA-4.0-Adult/M(Lopez)(EPTC#3)111134799652

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Armando Navarro
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Singles 18% · published 4.5
John Moore
published 4
3.59
David Corella
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Alejandro Cervantes
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published 4
3.41
Dmitry Vishnevetsky
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
Jesus Jeffery
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jesus Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jorge Chavez
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
Ralu Hinojos
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Rodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Victor Tapia
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alejandro Cervantes + Rodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez6260% gamesnot enough data
Ralu Hinojos + Alejandro Cervantes044 matchesnot enough data
Jesus Martinez + Rodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Armando Navarro
6W–7L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
John Moore
no matches on record · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
David Corella
9W–6L career · 6 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Alejandro Cervantes
23W–22L career · 24 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Dmitry Vishnevetsky
43W–17L career · 24 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jesus Jeffery
30W–26L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jesus Martinez
60W–33L career · 24 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jorge Chavez
65W–35L career · 25 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ralu Hinojos
52W–38L career · 26 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rodrigo Montes de Oca Sanchez
14W–5L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Victor Tapia
16W–16L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.