Teams

Brault - Court Queens

2026 NOVA Combo · NOVA Combo 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · NOVA Combo 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Brault - Court Queens000000
2Mattis - Volley Girls000000
3Montague-Daddio000000
4Rice Girls000000
5Dolan - Belle Haven Aces 5.5000000
6Konya - Chantilly Ace000000
7Hall - Deuces Wild000000
8White - Vienna Vixens - 5.5 Fall 2026000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Shannon Sikes
published
2.74
Cindy Brault
published 3
2.70
Julia Shin
published
2.63
Sarah Lewis
published
2.56
Jenny Oum
published 3
2.53
Pooja Singh
published
2.53
Qian Sheng
published
2.47
Kamala Ismayilova
published
2.44
Kelsey Kosztowny
published
2.41
Maryam Nasimov
published
2.37
Judy Pringle
published
2.37
Teri McCarthy
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Shin + Cindy Brault2342% games−0.1% vs expected
Maryam Nasimov + Kamala Ismayilova033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Sikes
9W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Cindy Brault
7W–8L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Julia Shin
5W–9L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Sarah Lewis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
Jenny Oum
14W–25L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
Pooja Singh
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
Qian Sheng
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
Kamala Ismayilova
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.47
Kelsey Kosztowny
6W–20L career · no lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.44
Maryam Nasimov
3W–14L career · no lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.41
Judy Pringle
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Teri McCarthy
39W–49L career · no lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.