Teams

Tie Breaks for Turkeys

2025 · 2026 Fall Social

30 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 Fall Social have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 29 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
3.90
Jarred Kaplan
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.82
Antonio Holmes
published 4
3.79
Natali Wiedemann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.74
Thadeus Cacanindin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.55
Todd Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.39
Wesley Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.36
Trevor Boyer
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.34
Sueanne Reynolds
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Angel Garrett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.28
Melissa Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.10
DEBRA SLEDGE
usually #1 Doubles 45%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.10
Lisa Dykes
published
3.04
Alexander Shipp
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.00
Brannon Barragan
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.98
Kellie Rhyne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Brandy Brown
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
April Terry
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 3
2.83
Wes Hutto
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Tara Armistead
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Caroline Morse
published 3
2.79
Mandy Carter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
LaVonda Daniels
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
2.69
Felicia Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.53
Kasey Hartzog
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.37
Chris Akins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.33
Gina Sellers
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.26
Lauren Fleming
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.12
Joy Kaplan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Linda Ward
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kellie Rhyne + Brandy Brown16563% games+1.3% vs expected
Mandy Carter + Tara Armistead2545% games−0.9% vs expected
Joy Kaplan + Lauren Fleming2444% games−1.9% vs expected
Thadeus Cacanindin + Antonio Holmes224 matchesnot enough data
Thadeus Cacanindin + Stephen Nettelhorst224 matchesnot enough data
DEBRA SLEDGE + Felicia Brooks224 matchesnot enough data
Gina Sellers + Felicia Brooks033 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Chapman + Angel Garrett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephen Nettelhorst
157W–52L career · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
4.03
Jarred Kaplan
33W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Antonio Holmes
13W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
Natali Wiedemann
20W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
Thadeus Cacanindin
32W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
Todd Henderson
37W–18L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Wesley Robinson
42W–58L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
Trevor Boyer
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36
Sueanne Reynolds
34W–18L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Angel Garrett
30W–21L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Melissa Chapman
41W–18L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3
DEBRA SLEDGE
46W–31L career · 20 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.10
Lisa Dykes
12W–24L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Alexander Shipp
22W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Brannon Barragan
17W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Kellie Rhyne
34W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.98
3
Brandy Brown
22W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
April Terry
32W–21L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Wes Hutto
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Tara Armistead
19W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Caroline Morse
11W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
Mandy Carter
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
LaVonda Daniels
16W–32L career · 13 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Felicia Brooks
24W–63L career · 16 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Kasey Hartzog
7W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.53
2.5
Chris Akins
18W–24L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.37
3
Gina Sellers
23W–65L career · 23 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.33
Lauren Fleming
6W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
Joy Kaplan
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Linda Ward
10W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.