Teams

Stankovsky

2026 Adult 55 & Over WINTER Daytime · 8.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-09vs Jensen: 55's Winter 26Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLynne O'Reilly / Carol Samuelson vs Theresa Harich / Jane Hill2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDede Montgomery / Mary Donovan vs Susan Gherity / Christy Douglas2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLynne Kaufman / Elise Kingman vs Karen Ostenso / Carol Steiger2-6, 3-6
2026-03-02vs Pargal: Happy to play inside!Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDebbie Vorpahl / Kathy Lynch vs Suzy Griffith / Janice Ring4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Donovan / Sally McDonald vs Barbara Pjevach / Angela Fischels4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMargret Stankovsky / Lynne O'Reilly vs Lisbeth Sjoblad / Kimberly Barry6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesCarol Samuelson / Heather Fernandez vs Virginia Kuberski / Margaret Creighton3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMargret Stankovsky / Mary Donovan vs Virginia de la Riva / Amy Wix3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-02-16vs Barr/Woodstra WLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Donovan / Lynne Kaufman vs Elizabeth Hughes / Patty Barr2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Fernandez / Carol Samuelson vs Amy Biewen / Julie Woodstra4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElise Kingman / Margret Stankovsky vs Paula Riggi / Kristy Reardan1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-02-02vs Jensen: 55's Winter 26Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLynne O'Reilly / Carol Samuelson vs Sarah Tuel / Carol Steiger6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarrie van Wert / Dede Montgomery vs Susan Gherity / Christy Douglas3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMargret Stankovsky / Elise Kingman vs Jane Hill / Theresa Harich0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-01-26vs Pargal: Happy to play inside!Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLynne O'Reilly / Carol Samuelson vs Noelle Dougan / Dawn Reidinger2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLynne Kaufman / Debbie Vorpahl vs Angela Fischels / Katie Pargal3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMargret Stankovsky / Elise Kingman vs Lydia Crouser / Elizabeth Olig6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesDede Montgomery / Kathy Lynch vs Virginia de la Riva / Amy Wix6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLynne Kaufman / Carrie van Wert vs Lorraine Hulbert / Kristin Nesseth7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLynne O'Reilly / Elise Kingman vs Zeny McCoy / Ruth Church3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-12vs Barr/Woodstra WLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Lynch / Dede Montgomery vs Julie Woodstra / Maria Johnson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLynne O'Reilly / Debbie Vorpahl vs Stacey Johnson / Lisa LaCombe7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMargret Stankovsky / Mary Donovan vs Amy Biewen / Elizabeth Hughes4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Dede Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Lynne O'Reilly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Carrie van Wert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Mary Donovan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.64
Debbie Vorpahl
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Carol Samuelson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.60
Heather Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Lynne Kaufman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Elise Kingman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Margret Stankovsky
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Sally McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Vorpahl + Lynne Kaufman2646% games+3.5% vs expected
Mary Donovan + Lynne Kaufman6747% games+3.2% vs expected
Carol Samuelson + Lynne O'Reilly111451% games+0.5% vs expected
Elise Kingman + Margret Stankovsky1639% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Vorpahl + Carrie van Wert134 matchesnot enough data
Mary Donovan + Sally McDonald134 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Vorpahl + Lynne O'Reilly213 matchesnot enough data
Elise Kingman + Lynne O'Reilly123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dede Montgomery
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
Lynne O'Reilly
20W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Carrie van Wert
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
Mary Donovan
17W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.65
4
Debbie Vorpahl
8W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Carol Samuelson
14W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Heather Fernandez
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Lynne Kaufman
29W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Elise Kingman
2W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Margret Stankovsky
9W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sally McDonald
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.