Teams

Cherokee Town & CC (Deborah King)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 3.0 Women

22 players · average NTRP 2.92 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Sarah Ficke
published
3.24
Katherine Snell
published
3.00
Carrie Brune
published 3
2.88
Leisa Richman
published
2.87
Deborah King
published 3
2.85
Amber Jenkins
published 3
2.83
Dana Giacone
published 3
2.80
Jennifer Novellas
published
2.79
Sarah Rogers
published
2.76
Kelsey Bentley
published
Ashley Bundy
published 3
2.71
Sarah O'Brien
published
2.69
Merideth Manning
published
2.62
Tracy Merrill
published
2.59
Erin Graner
published
2.54
Marilyn Cain
published
2.53
Karol Lawrence
published
Deborah Hurst
published 2.5
Donna Gober
published
Kate McKenzie
published
Sunitha Shivaram
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Jenkins + Carrie Brune4255% games+6.5% vs expected
Erin Graner + Karol Lawrence3449% games+4.5% vs expected
Deborah Hurst + Tracy Merrill224 matchesnot enough data
Deborah King + Sarah O'Brien224 matchesnot enough data
Deborah King + Dana Giacone123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Ficke
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Katherine Snell
20W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
3
Carrie Brune
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Leisa Richman
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Deborah King
26W–35L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Amber Jenkins
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Dana Giacone
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Jennifer Novellas
20W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Sarah Rogers
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Kelsey Bentley
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Ashley Bundy
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah O'Brien
15W–19L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Merideth Manning
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Tracy Merrill
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Erin Graner
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
2.59
Marilyn Cain
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Karol Lawrence
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
2.5
Deborah Hurst
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Donna Gober
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kate McKenzie
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Catherine Gober
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sunitha Shivaram
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.