Teams

SYR: Champions

2025 40&Over Women · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.64 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-08vs Syracuse Set SistersSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Greenwald / Mary Alice Winn vs Anne Matt / Nicole Simpson4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesVivian Zayas vs Julie Grossman6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Madan / Susan Ronsvalle vs Jennifer Hawthorne / Nisha Singh4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKris Chan / Kathleen Metcalf vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-24vs Syracuse Set SistersSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAlison Roe / Yael Miller vs Alysia Schmaltz / Melissa Rock6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesVivian Zayas vs Jennifer Hawthorne6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Metcalf / Emily Madan vs Anne Brandt / Lucy Martin1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLinda Meade / Mary Kaye vs Tracy Bates / Carri Moore1-6, 3-6
2025-06-17vs Syracuse Set SistersSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAlison Roe / Yael Miller vs Nisha Singh / Anne Matt7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesVivian Zayas vs Tracy Bates6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Greenwald / Mary Kaye vs Jennifer Hawthorne / Alysia Schmaltz6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Meade / Ping Zhang vs Jill Pitts / Nicole Simpson2-6, 0-6
2025-06-10vs Syracuse Set SistersLost 13
L#1 DoublesYael Miller / Mary Alice Winn vs Jill Pitts / Nicole Simpson2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLinda Meade vs Tracy Bates3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Greenwald / Mary Kaye vs Carri Moore / Anne Brandt6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPing Zhang / Erin Werner vs Anne Matt / Nisha Singh1-6, 2-6
2025-05-27vs Syracuse Set SistersWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlison Roe / Yael Miller vs Jennifer Hawthorne / Nisha Singh6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Greenwald vs Tracy Bates6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Meade / Vivian Zayas vs Alysia Schmaltz / Judy Tracy6-2, 6-2
2025-05-20vs Syracuse Set SistersSplit 22
L#1 DoublesYael Miller / Erin Werner vs Anne Matt / Alysia Schmaltz3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesKris Chan vs Tracy Bates4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Metcalf / Emily Madan vs Nisha Singh / Melissa Rock6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Greenwald / Mary Kaye vs Carri Moore / Julie Grossman6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SYR: Champions06131123177
2Syracuse Set Sisters06111327223

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Carolyn Greenwald
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Alison Roe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Vivian Zayas
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.58
Emily Madan
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 46% · published 3.5
3.40
Erin Werner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Mary Kaye
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Kris Chan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Linda Meade
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kathleen Metcalf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Alice Winn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ping Zhang
published
Susan Ronsvalle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Yael Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Roe + Yael Miller13360% games+3.8% vs expected
Kris Chan + Linda Meade2344% games−2.6% vs expected
Mary Kaye + Kathleen Metcalf4253% gamesnot enough data
Kris Chan + Mary Kaye1433% gamesnot enough data
Yael Miller + Erin Werner134 matchesnot enough data
Yael Miller + Kathleen Metcalf314 matchesnot enough data
Linda Meade + Mary Kaye033 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Greenwald + Mary Kaye213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Greenwald
44W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Alison Roe
21W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
Vivian Zayas
59W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Emily Madan
132W–60L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.58
3.5
Erin Werner
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Mary Kaye
165W–108L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Kris Chan
58W–106L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Linda Meade
32W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Kathleen Metcalf
46W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Alice Winn
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ping Zhang
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Ronsvalle
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Yael Miller
24W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.