Teams

Ly.Manweiler18T

2023 Cap Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2023-07-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Hagens / Candace Brittain vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLynne Manweiler / Ginger Sluder vs Mindy Edwards / Amanda Williams4-6, 6-7
2023-07-21vs Am.Fish18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Hagens / Dana Rawls vs Adrienne Todd / Susan Marie Hill1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-07-15vs Ci.Winzenz18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlicia Buglak / Karen Hagens vs Emily Culbreth / Camille Conzola3-6, 3-6
2023-07-12vs Da.Haney18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlicia Buglak / Karen Hagens vs Cary Brege / Liz Broadway6-7, 5-7
2023-07-07vs Ja.Limkakeng18TLost 02
L#1 DoublesLynne Manweiler / Heather Mittag vs Allison Ostrander / Amber Ameredes2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDana Rawls / Molly Briggs vs Amy Sams / Nicole Rahm3-6, 2-6
2023-06-20vs Pa.Spell18TWon 10
W#1 DoublesLynne Manweiler / Jackie Hilbert vs Susie EL-Kaissi / Natalie Regan7-5, 6-4
2023-06-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesMolly Briggs / Lynne Manweiler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-13vs Ki.Johnson18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynne Manweiler / Cindy Faltisco vs Chunhui Higgins / Susan Fanelly4-6, 2-6
2023-06-09vs Am.Pena18TLost 02
L#2 DoublesLynne Manweiler / Molly Briggs vs Kim von Weihe / Leah Ragsdale6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Hunt / Karen Hagens vs Deanna Drescher / LeAnne Bloedon5-7, 4-6
2023-06-02vs Li.Ihly18TSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMolly Briggs / Heather Mittag vs Kana Brinckerhoff / Virginia Jenkins3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCandace Brittain / Dana Rawls vs Suzanne Brown / Lynda Blelloch6-3, 7-6
2023-05-30vs Pa.Cochran18TWon 10
W#1 DoublesLynne Manweiler / Ginger Sluder vs Ranita Airington / Lisa Lathram6-1, 6-0
2023-05-23vs De.Skiko18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesJackie Hilbert / Lynne Manweiler vs Deb Skiko / Aileen Carroll1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5-4.0-4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Kimberly Boyd
published
3.91
Molly Briggs
published
3.87
Olga DeGroff
published
3.83
Winston Henderson
published
3.79
Julia Kim
published
3.79
Heather Mittag
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Karen McKee
published
3.53
Dana Rawls
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Lynne Manweiler
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.42
Karen Hagens
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Danielle Stringer
published 3.5
Michelle Vedder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Hagens + Dana Rawls9654% games+7.3% vs expected
Lynne Manweiler + Heather Mittag224 matchesnot enough data
Molly Briggs + Dana Rawls303 matchesnot enough data
Molly Briggs + Winston Henderson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Boyd
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
4.13
Molly Briggs
34W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
Olga DeGroff
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.87
Winston Henderson
17W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
Julia Kim
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.79
4
Heather Mittag
104W–59L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
Karen McKee
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Dana Rawls
129W–111L career · 3 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Lynne Manweiler
90W–125L career · 8 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Karen Hagens
79W–71L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Danielle Stringer
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Michelle Vedder
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.