Teams

SMacIntosh (Charlotte Indoor)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Men - Thurs PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-06vs CGardner/Rivera (Life Time)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJason DeAngelis / Will Lewis III vs Charles Manning / Pedro Rivera Hernandez2-6, 4-6
2022-09-29vs MChaney (Raintree)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBharath Chandra / Will Lewis III vs Chris Estridge / Philip Solomon4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-09-22vs DTyson (Life Time)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesWill Lewis III / Hunter Cannon vs TIEFENG ZHANG / Jean-Paul Schoubert4-6, 2-6
2022-09-15vs PKartes (Mountainbrook)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesHunter Cannon / Will Lewis III vs Ben Senn / Michal Jarzynski1-6, 1-6
2022-09-08vs GPawlush (Weddington)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesWill Lewis III / Clay Willson vs Kevin Warren / Scott Waldrop2-6, 4-6
2022-09-01vs KFox (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesWill Lewis III / Hunter Cannon vs Kevin Fox / Andrew Hocek2-6, 6-7
2022-08-25vs JDichak (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKibbee Reese / Scott MacIntosh vs Todd Creange / Frank Grindle6-1, 6-2
2022-08-18vs MBoyce/HGuerouani (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesScott MacIntosh / Kibbee Reese vs Taylor Brown / Lance Dunlap6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHunter Cannon / Will Lewis III vs Saurabh Tyagi / Matt Allen6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-08-11vs DDemaine (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKibbee Reese / Gregory Vlahos vs Jim Yablonski / Austin Miller2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWill Lewis III / Bharath Chandra vs Sai Venky Ganduri / John Bentley1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Kibbee Reese
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.35
David Maloney
published 3.5
3.16
Hunter Cannon
published 3.5
3.16
Will Lewis III
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Scott MacIntosh
published
2.97
Gregory Vlahos
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Will Lewis III + Hunter Cannon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kibbee Reese
17W–41L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
David Maloney
3W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Hunter Cannon
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Will Lewis III
37W–85L career · 8 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Scott MacIntosh
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Gregory Vlahos
1W–11L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.