Teams

Shades of Grey

2026 Legends League Session I (Spring) · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-18vs DandelionsWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnn Chun / Marilyn Nakamura vs Elaine Yoshinaga / Joanie Shibuya3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSally Takamine / Setsuko Tamura vs Ada Ozaki / Leslie Au Young6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJan Matsuura / Kathleen Teruya vs Madeline Chun / Lorianne Siu6-4, 6-3
2026-03-04vs DandelionsWon 21
W#1 DoublesRiko Kuroki / Raelene Domingues vs Leslie Au Young / Joanie Shibuya3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJan Matsuura / Rinda Fernandes vs Lorianne Siu / Ada Ozaki6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSally Takamine / Kathleen Teruya vs Wendy Barnfield / Phyllis Tsukayama4-6, 2-6
2026-02-25vs DandelionsWon 21
L#1 DoublesSally Takamine / Rinda Fernandes vs Leslie Au Young / Tatyana Stauffer3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Chun / Allynne Tom vs Elaine Yoshinaga / Ada Ozaki7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRiko Kuroki / Jan Matsuura vs Madeline Chun / Debbie Au6-2, 6-2
2026-02-18vs DandelionsLost 12
W#1 DoublesRaelene Domingues / Riko Kuroki vs Tatyana Stauffer / Phyllis Tsukayama6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRinda Fernandes / Kathleen Teruya vs Wendy Barnfield / Ada Ozaki3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Bernstein / Allynne Tom vs Debbie Au / Elaine Yoshinaga6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-02-11vs DandelionsLost 12
L#1 DoublesRinda Fernandes / Ann Chun vs Tatyana Stauffer / Phyllis Tsukayama6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarilyn Nakamura / Riko Kuroki vs Wendy Barnfield / Madeline Chun2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSally Takamine / Jan Matsuura vs Debbie Au / Elaine Yoshinaga6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-02-04vs DandelionsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJan Matsuura / Allynne Tom vs Joanie Shibuya / Debbie Au7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnn Chun / Setsuko Tamura vs Wendy Barnfield / Phyllis Tsukayama4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Bernstein / Kathleen Teruya vs Leslie Au Young / Lorianne Siu2-6, 3-6
2026-01-28vs DandelionsLost 12
W#1 DoublesSally Takamine / Setsuko Tamura vs Debbie Au / Lorianne Siu6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJan Matsuura / Ann Chun vs Joanie Shibuya / Leslie Au Young3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarilyn Nakamura / Riko Kuroki vs Madeline Chun / Elaine Yoshinaga4-6, 2-6
2026-01-21vs DandelionsWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarilyn Nakamura / Suzanne Bernstein vs Joanie Shibuya / Tatyana Stauffer1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSally Takamine / Setsuko Tamura vs Leslie Au Young / Wendy Barnfield7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRinda Fernandes / Allynne Tom vs Debbie Au / Phyllis Tsukayama2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Setsuko Tamura
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Raelene Domingues
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Allynne Tom
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Ann Chun
published 3.5
3.24
Riko Kuroki
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Sally Takamine
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Rinda Fernandes
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Kathleen Teruya
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Jan Matsuura
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Marilyn Nakamura
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.73
Suzanne Bernstein
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Carolyn Nomura
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allynne Tom + Jan Matsuura5166% games+17.6% vs expected
Sally Takamine + Setsuko Tamura8260% games+3.9% vs expected
Sally Takamine + Kathleen Teruya2443% gamesnot enough data
Marilyn Nakamura + Kathleen Teruya2346% gamesnot enough data
Riko Kuroki + Raelene Domingues5067% gamesnot enough data
Allynne Tom + Rinda Fernandes4160% gamesnot enough data
Riko Kuroki + Allynne Tom134 matchesnot enough data
Riko Kuroki + Jan Matsuura314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Setsuko Tamura
67W–48L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Raelene Domingues
104W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Allynne Tom
91W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Ann Chun
4W–13L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Riko Kuroki
44W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Sally Takamine
42W–56L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Rinda Fernandes
51W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Kathleen Teruya
30W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Jan Matsuura
80W–75L career · 6 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Marilyn Nakamura
31W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
Suzanne Bernstein
27W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Carolyn Nomura
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.