Teams

Dolls With Balls

2022 TRI-LEVEL - POCATELLO · Women's 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.20 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-06vs MispiretaLost 03
L#1 DoublesSara Last / Heather McGeehan vs Carrie Rose Lindley / Aspin Rhoades6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmber Nelson / Rachel Smith vs Michele Surmelis / Lisa Holt3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLori Tapanila / MacKenzie Andrews vs Monica Mispireta / Heather Farnsworth0-6, 0-6
2022-05-02vs TrifectaWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Huckstep / Heather McGeehan vs Quincy Sutton / Shauna Myler1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRachel Smith / Wendy Workman vs Karlee Moeai / Lyn McArthur6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGrace Jory / Annie Goode vs Lynette Sayre / Nicolle Peterson6-2, 6-3
2022-04-30vs MispiretaLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmber Nelson / Sara Last vs Christine Paulsen / Sarah Davids4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAnnie Goode / Wendy Workman vs Michele Surmelis / Shanea Bevins6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLori Tapanila / MacKenzie Andrews vs Monica Mispireta / Heather Farnsworth0-6, 1-6
2022-04-29vs TrifectaLost 12
W#1 DoublesSara Last / Jill Huckstep vs Shauna Myler / Quincy Sutton6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRachel Smith / Amber Nelson vs Anita Gibson / Karlee Moeai3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLori Tapanila / MacKenzie Andrews vs Tiffany Topliff / Nicolle Peterson4-6, 1-6
2022-04-22vs TrifectaWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather McGeehan / Jill Huckstep vs Melissa Brake / Alexandra Topliff6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRachel Smith / Amber Nelson vs Anita Gibson / Gina Nielsen7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori Tapanila / Grace Jory vs Lynette Sayre / Nicolle Peterson2-6, 3-6
2022-04-09vs MispiretaLost 12
L#1 DoublesGrace Jory / MacKenzie Andrews vs Monica Mispireta / Emily Smith1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesWendy Workman / Rachel Smith vs Lisa Holt / Shanea Bevins6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSara Last / Jill Huckstep vs Aspin Rhoades / Carrie Rose Lindley6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-04-01vs TrifectaLost 12
L#1 DoublesSara Last / Heather McGeehan vs Wendy Elison / Melissa Brake2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmber Nelson / Wendy Workman vs Lyn McArthur / Anita Gibson0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLori Tapanila / Annie Goode vs Tiffany Topliff / Lynette Sayre6-1, 7-5
2022-03-30vs MispiretaWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Huckstep / Heather McGeehan vs Michele Surmelis / Carrie Rose Lindley7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmber Nelson / Wendy Workman vs Camille Aguinaga / Lisa Holt7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLori Tapanila / Annie Goode vs Emily Smith / Heather Farnsworth1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women's 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mispireta7117719177
2Dolls With Balls35101431231
3Trifecta2691533222

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Heather McGeehan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Grace Jory
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.04
Annie Goode
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Amber Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.56
Lori Tapanila
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jill Huckstep
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
MacKenzie Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sara Last
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Wendy Workman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annie Goode + Grace Jory3353% games+5.9% vs expected
Lori Tapanila + MacKenzie Andrews033 matchesnot enough data
Heather McGeehan + Jill Huckstep213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather McGeehan
53W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Grace Jory
106W–88L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.09
3.5
Annie Goode
42W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Amber Nelson
64W–53L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Lori Tapanila
61W–108L career · 6 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
2.56
Jill Huckstep
28W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
MacKenzie Andrews
2W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Last
11W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Workman
65W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.