Teams

Edwards - Winter Haven

2021 Polk Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-08vs Darch - BeermanLost 13
W#1 DoublesJackie Edwards / Arabia Brakefield vs Brandie Philpot / Jan Borden6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAngie Mudge vs Tessie Beltran6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHeather Cain / Norma Solters vs Cynthia Nettles / Shelley Robinson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Payne / Hilda Franco vs Melissa Darch / Melanie Langley6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesArabia Brakefield / Heather Cain vs Dama Register / Kimberly Elmhorst6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrandi Harper / Hilda Franco vs Tiffany Osler Kilpatrick / Tracy Achinger6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2021-06-17vs Darch - BeermanWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeather Cain / Hilda Franco vs Cynthia Nettles / Shelley Robinson3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAngie Mudge vs Tessie Beltran6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJackie Edwards / Arabia Brakefield vs Melanie Langley / Senita Hanif6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesBrandi Harper / Hilda Franco vs Lisa Moseley / Susan White1-0
W#2 DoublesArabia Brakefield / Melody Johnson vs Lizette Murphy / Kimberly Elmhorst6-3, 7-6
2021-05-27vs Darch - BeermanWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrandi Harper / Hilda Franco vs Melissa Darch / Cynthia Nettles6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDebra Edwards / Marquel Harrell vs Robin Ryan / Ann Rainer6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesHeather Cain / Brandi Harper vs Emily Johnson / Jaimi Miller6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJackie Edwards / Hilda Franco vs Ellen Salm / Susan Dreyer3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Arabia Brakefield
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Jackie Edwards
published 4
3.32
Heather Cain
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Marcia Whitney
published 3.5
3.02
Marquel Harrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Hilda Franco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.84
Angie Mudge
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcia Whitney + Marquel Harrell4247% games+3.5% vs expected
Hilda Franco + Heather Cain4255% gamesnot enough data
Heather Cain + Marquel Harrell1447% gamesnot enough data
Arabia Brakefield + Heather Cain404 matchesnot enough data
Hilda Franco + Marquel Harrell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arabia Brakefield
164W–119L career · 6 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Jackie Edwards
5W–10L career · no lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Heather Cain
74W–46L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Marcia Whitney
61W–80L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
Marquel Harrell
40W–50L career · 1 line in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Hilda Franco
88W–105L career · 6 lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Angie Mudge
49W–104L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.