Teams

IT'S AH RAPP!

2023 Montgomery Adult 55 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.46 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-12vs Fun TennisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAndrea Motley / Karlene Brathwaite vs Elizabeth Pugh / Rosanne Johnston6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDenise Martin Barnes / Shirin Ahmed vs Mayumi Ishihara / Nancy Trimble4-6, 5-5
2023-07-09vs KrudysLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Haney / Andrea Motley vs Shelley Puterman / Robin Khan3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesValerie Pierce / Thedra White vs Kim Hazel / Mary Beth Etherton5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesShirin Ahmed / Denise Martin Barnes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-25vs Fun TennisLost 12
L#1 DoublesRegina Farrington / Esther Wang vs Elizabeth Hunter / Shonya Sturdivant4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesThedra White / Jade Moore vs Angela Ferguson / Min Chen6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJothi Nedungadi / Shirin Ahmed vs Mazie Efinger / Jennifer Hess5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-06-19vs KrudysWon 20
W#2 DoublesRegina Farrington / Esther Wang vs Maureen Cook / Audrey Yen6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKarlene Brathwaite / Jade Moore vs Kim Rehmann / Suzanne Krudys6-4, 6-3
2023-06-12vs Fun TennisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaura McNay / Regina Farrington vs Julia Latein-Kimmig / Katherine Dodson4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarrie Wofford / Marie Sokoloff vs Meaghan McHugh / Chrystal Goonewardene2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-08vs KrudysWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura McNay / Laura Haney vs Maureen Cook / Shelley Puterman6-0, 6-2
2023-05-22vs KrudysLost 01
L#3 DoublesKarlene Brathwaite / Jothi Nedungadi vs Suzanne Krudys / Christine Guelcher3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-16vs Fun TennisLost 01
L#1 DoublesRegina Farrington / Marie Sokoloff vs Julia Latein-Kimmig / Marie Kelly2-6, 4-6
2023-05-09vs KrudysWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Haney / Cynthia Rapp vs Frances Brennan / Christine Guelcher6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarie Sokoloff / Carrie Wofford vs Suzanne Krudys / Sandy Horowitz7-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesThedra White / Jade Moore vs Rosalie Hooper / Li Ives3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Marie Sokoloff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Cynthia Rapp
published 3.5
3.35
Jade Moore
published 3.5
3.30
Laura Haney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Regina Farrington
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Andrea Motley
published 3.5
Carrie Wofford
published 3.5
3.23
Karlene Brathwaite
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
3.22
Jackie Livesay
published 3.5
3.17
Shirin Ahmed
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Laura McNay
published
3.01
Esther Wang
published 3.5
2.90
Thedra White
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jothi Nedungadi
published
Valerie Pierce
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regina Farrington + Marie Sokoloff0533% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marie Sokoloff
277W–199L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Cynthia Rapp
36W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Jade Moore
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
Laura Haney
374W–273L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Regina Farrington
179W–186L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Andrea Motley
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Carrie Wofford
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Karlene Brathwaite
145W–136L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Denise Martin Barnes
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Jackie Livesay
13W–17L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Shirin Ahmed
198W–134L career · 10 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Laura McNay
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Esther Wang
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Thedra White
81W–99L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
Jothi Nedungadi
15W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Valerie Pierce
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.